O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 46-3-272 (2019)

Derivative actions by members

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A derivative action may be brought by a member in the right of the electric membership corporation to procure a judgment in its favor against directors, officers, or other representatives of the electric membership corporation or members or third parties, or any combination thereof, whenever the electric membership corporation has a claim or cause of action which the representatives of the electric membership corporation, in violation of their duties, have failed to enforce, including a claim or cause of action against such representatives for their failure in this respect. However, a derivative action may not be brought until the expiration of 30 days after a member has delivered written demand upon the directors, officers, or other representatives of the electric membership corporation who are alleged to have failed to enforce such cause of action, setting forth the claim or cause of action which is sought to be enforced and the basis therefor. (b) In a derivative action brought by one or more members in the right of an electric membership corporation to procure a judgment in favor of the electric membership corporation, the complaint shall be verified and shall allege that the plaintiff is a member at the time of bringing the action. It shall further allege that the plaintiff was a member at the time of the transaction of which he complained and that the demand required by subsection (a) of this Code section has been properly made. (c) Such action shall not be discontinued, compromised, or settled without the approval of the court having jurisdiction of the action. If the court determines that the interest of the members will be substantially affected by such discontinuance, compromise, or settlement, the court shall direct that notice, by publication or otherwise, of the action and the proposed discontinuance, compromise, or settlement thereof be given to the members. If notice is directed to be given, the court may determine which one or more of the parties to the action shall bear the expense of giving the same in such amount as the court shall determine and find to be reasonable in the circumstances. (d) If such action is successful in whole or in part or if anything is received by the plaintiff or plaintiffs as the result of the judgment, compromise, or settlement thereof, the court may award the plaintiff or

plaintiffs reasonable expenses, including reasonable fees of attorneys, and shall direct him or them to account to the electric membership corporation for the remainder of the proceeds so received by him or them. (e) In any such action instituted after July 1, 1981, the court having jurisdiction, upon final judgment and the finding that the action was brought without reasonable cause, may require the plaintiff or plaintiffs to pay the parties named as defendants the reasonable expenses, including fees of attorneys, incurred by them in defense of such action.

History

(Code 1933, § 34C-512, enacted by Ga. L. 1981, p. 1587, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 19 Am. Jur. 2d, Corporations, §§ 2243, 2244, 2250-2252, 2259-2262, 2272, 2326.

C.J.S. - 1A C.J.S., Actions, § 58.

Part 6 Directors and Officers

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1990–2017 · leading case: Brown v. Pounds, 711 S.E.2d 646 (Ga. 2011).
Brown v. Pounds, 711 S.E.2d 646 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 4× “On December 3, 2008, the trial court issued an order approving the Agreement, see OCGA § 46-3-272 (c) (derivative action by member of EMC shall not be settled without court approval), and requiring the parties’ full cooperation in its implementation.”
Jordan v. Georgia Power Co., 466 S.E.2d 601 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 2× “Members of the corporation have the right to vote (OCGA § 46-3-266), to bring derivative actions (OCGA § 46-3-272), and to remove directors and certain officers and agents (OCGA §§ 46-3-295 and 46-3-302 (b), respectively).”
Lowman v. State, 398 S.E.2d 832 (Ga. Ct. App. 1990). · cites it 2× “Although OCGA § 46-3-340 (a) provides that electric membership corporations are operated without profit to their members, subsection (c) of that provision mandates that the bylaws of the corporation “contain provisions, consistent with subsection (a) of this Code section, for…”
Michael Shapiro v. Oglethorpe Power Corp. (Ga. Ct. App. 2017). · cites it 2× “Finally, the current-member appellants argue the trial court erred in finding that their claims against the distribution EMCs are derivative and must be dismissed because the appellants failed to comply with the pre-suit derivative-claim requirements of OCGA § 46-3-272 (a) and…”
— 46-3-272(c) — 1 case
Brown v. Pounds, 711 S.E.2d 646 (Ga. 2011). “On December 3, 2008, the trial court issued an order approving the Agreement, see OCGA § 46-3-272 (c) (derivative action by member of EMC shall not be settled without court approval), and requiring the parties’ full cooperation in its implementation.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.