Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Authority and power are granted to railroad companies to acquire by purchase or gift and to hold such real estate as may be necessary for all of the purposes mentioned in Code Section 46-8-120. If the real estate cannot be acquired by purchase or gift, then it may be acquired by condemnation in the manner provided in Title 22, provided that the right of condemnation under this Code section shall not be exercised until the commission, under such rules of procedure as it may provide, first approves the taking of the property.
(Ga. L. 1914, p. 144, §§ 1, 2; Code 1933, §§ 94-321, 94-322.)
- Former Code 1933, §§ 84-321 and 94-322 (see O.C.G.A. § 46-8-121) did not limit acquisition by railroad companies to unimproved land and did not restrict their power to condemn lands on which houses were situated. Landers v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 217 Ga. 804, 125 S.E.2d 495 (1962).
- The Public Service Commission's power to approve a railroad's condemnation for the relocation and expansion of its existing rail yard facilities includes the power to determine the necessity, propriety and expediency of the condemnation. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Central of Ga. R.R., 179 Ga. App. 415, 346 S.E.2d 568 (1986).
- The commission, in ruling on the propriety of a condemnation of property by a railroad for the purpose of expansion and improvement, should seek to determine whether the condemnation serves a public purpose, not whether the condemnation "best serves" the public interest. Central of Ga. R.R. v. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n, 257 Ga. 217, 356 S.E.2d 865 (1987).
- Whether a more suitable site is proposed is not controlling because the Public Service Commission is not obliged to approve a condemnation under O.C.G.A. § 46-8-121 for a proposed purpose. Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Central of Ga. R.R., 179 Ga. App. 415, 346 S.E.2d 568 (1986).
Cited in Ammons v. Central of Ga. Ry., 215 Ga. 758, 113 S.E.2d 438 (1960); Georgia Pub. Serv. Comm'n v. Central of Ga. R.R., 184 Ga. App. 241, 361 S.E.2d 723 (1987).
- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Eminent Domain, §§ 20, 23, 51, 123, 137. 65 Am. Jur. 2d, Railroads, §§ 39, 42 et seq.
- 29A C.J.S., Eminent Domain, § 33. 74 C.J.S., Railroads, §§ 133 et seq., 147, 148 et seq.
- Assessment of railroad right of way for local improvements, 37 A.L.R. 219; 82 A.L.R. 425.
Condemnation of premises or part thereof as affecting rights of landlord and tenant inter se, 163 A.L.R. 679.
Condemner's waiver, surrender, or limitation, after award, of rights or part of property acquired by condemnation, 5 A.L.R.2d 724.
Spur track and the like as constituting a use for which railroad can validly exercise right of eminent domain, 35 A.L.R.2d 1326.
Right to intervene in court review of zoning proceeding, 46 A.L.R.2d 1059.
Admissibility, in eminent domain proceeding, of evidence as to price paid for condemned real property during pendency of the proceeding, 55 A.L.R.2d 781.
Admissibility, in eminent domain proceeding, of evidence as to price paid for condemned real property on sale prior to the proceeding, 55 A.L.R.2d 791.
Right of adjoining landowners to intervene in condemnation proceedings on ground that they might suffer consequential damage, 61 A.L.R.2d 1292.
What constitutes abandonment of a railroad right of way, 95 A.L.R.2d 468.
Eminent domain: right of owner of land not originally taken or purchased as part of adjacent project to recover, on enlargement of project to include adjacent land, enhanced value of property by reason of proximity to original land - state cases, 95 A.L.R.3d 752.
Eminent domain: recovery of value of improvements made with knowledge of impending condemnation, 98 A.L.R.3d 504.
State statute of limitations applicable to inverse condemnation or similar proceedings by landowner to obtain compensation for direct appropriation of land without the institution or conclusion of formal proceedings against specific owner, 26 A.L.R.4th 68.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-06-18
Citation: 356 S.E.2d 865, 257 Ga. 217, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 779
Snippet: and the new hybrid statute now lies at OCGA § 46-8-121. When this change was made, the phrase "for the