O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 47-23-41 (2019)

Employee contributions

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) Any person who becomes a superior court judge, a judge or solicitor-general of a state court, a juvenile court judge, or a district attorney on or after July 1, 1998, shall be a member of this retirement system and shall make employee contributions into the fund. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to a person who elected membership in the Employees’ Retirement System of Georgia pursuant to Code Section (b) No juvenile court judge who also serves as a judge or solicitor-general of a state court shall be eligible to obtain separate service under this chapter for each position held, and such service shall be combined for the purposes of this chapter. Any person holding two such positions shall make employee contributions under this chapter on the basis of the compensation received for both such positions, and the compensation received for both such positions shall be combined for all purposes under this chapter.

History

(Code 1981, § 47-23-41, enacted by Ga. L. 1998, p. 513, § 1.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in McKelvey v. Ga. Judicial Ret. Sys., 297 Ga. App. 650, 678 S.E.2d 120 (2009).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2009–2009 · leading case: McKelvey v. Georgia Jud. Ret. Sys., 678 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009).
McKelvey v. Georgia Jud. Ret. Sys., 678 S.E.2d 120 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “6 OCGA § 47-23-41 (a) (effective July 1, 1998); see also OCGA § 47-23-40 (any person who on June 30, 1998, was member of predecessor retirement system shall be transferred to JRS effective July 1, 1998).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.