Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1943, p. 640, § 11.)
- Since there is no vested right to benefits one was never entitled to receive, the reduction in future benefits to retiree did not violate the retiree's constitutional right to protection against impairment of contract. Tate v. Teachers' Retirement Sys., 257 Ga. 365, 359 S.E.2d 649 (1987).
- Subsection (b) of O.C.G.A. § 47-3-141 provides for correction of errors which result in payment of benefits which are less or greater than a member or beneficiary is entitled to receive, and thus implicitly authorizes the retirement system to review benefits conferred on the former executive secretary emeritus of the Georgia Association of Educators. Tate v. Teachers' Retirement Sys., 257 Ga. 365, 359 S.E.2d 649 (1987).
- 60A Am. Jur. 2d, Pensions and Retirement Funds, § 1244 et seq.
- 67 C.J.S., Officers and Public Employees, § 309. 70 C.J.S., Pensions, § 12. 78 C.J.S., Schools and School Districts, § 346.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-09-09
Citation: 359 S.E.2d 649, 257 Ga. 365
Snippet: found that the authority was implicit in OCGA § 47-3-141 (b) and that to give Dr. Tate and the GAE unfettered