O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 48-13-7 (2019)

Levy of occupation tax by localities on persons with no location or office in state; superseding of local law; tax payable to only one local government; exemption

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) The governing authority of each county is authorized to provide by local ordinance or resolution for the levy, assessment, and collection of occupation tax on those businesses and practitioners of professions and occupations with no location or office in the state in accordance with this Code section and to provide for the punishment of violation of such a local ordinance or resolution if the business or practitioner:

(1) Has one or more employees or agents who exert substantial efforts within the unincorporated part of the county for the purpose of soliciting business or serving customers or clients; or

(2) Owns personal or real property which generates income and which is located in the unincorporated part of the county.

(b) The governing authority of each municipal corporation is authorized to provide by local ordinance or resolution for the levy, assessment, and collection of occupation tax on those businesses and practi141 tioners of professions and occupations with no location or office in the state in accordance with this Code section and to provide for the punishment of violation of such a local ordinance or resolution if the business or practitioner:

(1) Has one or more employees or agents who exert substantial efforts within the corporate limits for the purpose of soliciting business or serving customers or clients; or

(2) Owns personal or real property which generates income and which is located in the corporate limits.

(c) This article supersedes any provisions of local law or city charter authorizing such taxes.

(d) Local governments levying occupation tax according to this Code section shall comply with Code Sections 48-13-10 through 48-13-13, except that: gross receipts of a business or practitioner for purposes of this Code section shall include only those gross receipts reasonably attributable to sales or services in this state; employees shall include only those employees engaged in substantial efforts within this state; and nation-wide profitability ratios shall apply only to types of business transacted within this state.

(e) Businesses and practitioners subject to this Code section shall be required to pay occupation tax to only one local government in this state, the local government for the municipal corporation or county in which the largest dollar volume of business is done or service is performed by the individual business or practitioner.

(f) If a business or practitioner subject to this Code section provides to the local government in this state which is authorized to levy occupation tax on such business or practitioner proof of payment of a local business or occupation tax in another state which purports to tax the business’s or practitioner’s sales or services in this state, the business or practitioner shall be exempt from local occupation tax in this state.

History

Code 1981, § 48-13-7, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1292, § 7; Ga. L. 1995, p. 419, § 1.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1993, p. 1292, § 7, effective

January 1, 1995, renumbered former Code Section § 48-13-7 as present Code Section 48-13-18.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS City’s occupation tax used same combination of criteria for all taxpayers. - Taxpayer claimed a city’s occupation tax did not classify different

companies by the same “combination of criteria” as required by O.C.G.A. § 48-13-10(a) as some businesses paid taxes based on the businesses’ gross

SPECIFIC, BUSINESS, & OCCUPATION TAXES

receipts, while others paid based on the number of the businesses’ employees. This claim failed as § 48-13-10(a)(1) and (a)(3) provided that an occupation tax could be calculated using both the number of

employees and gross receipts, and the occupation tax was calculated in the same manner for every company. GMC v. City of Doraville, 284 Ga. 689, 670 S.E.2d 787, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 1020 (2008).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1997–2018 · leading case: Cotton Pickin' Fairs, Inc. v. Town of Gay, 816 S.E.2d 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Cotton Pickin' Fairs, Inc. v. Town of Gay, 816 S.E.2d 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018). · cites it 4× “5 The Town's ordinance also provides for an occupation tax "upon out-of-state persons with no location or office in the state," pursuant to OCGA § 48-13-7. Neither the parties nor the trial court addressed the applicability of OCGA § 48-13-7 (b) to this case, or the provisions…”
Sexton v. City of Jonesboro, 481 S.E.2d 818 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 2× “ter, an occupation tax is levied, and each person engaged in any business, trade, profession, or occupation in the city, whether with a location in the city or in the case of an out-of-state business with no location in Georgia but exerting substantial efforts within the city or…”
Gen. Motors Corp. v. City of Doraville, 670 S.E.2d 787 (Ga. 2008). · cites it 2× “See OCGA § 48-13-7 (b) and City of Doraville Code of Ordinances Chapter 6, §§ 6-601 and 6-603 (A).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.