O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 48-13-9 (2019)

Limitation on authority of local government to impose regulatory fee; examples of individuals and entities which may and may not be subject to fees; methods for determining fees

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) A local government is authorized to require a business or practitioner of a profession or occupation to pay a regulatory fee only if the local government customarily performs investigation or inspection of such businesses or practitioners of such profession or occupation as protection of the public health, safety, or welfare or in the course of enforcing a state or local building, health, or safety code, but no local government is authorized to use regulatory fees as a means of raising revenue for general purposes, provided that the amount of a regulatory fee shall approximate the reasonable cost of the actual regulatory activity performed by the local government and the proceeds of such regulatory fee shall be used to fund such regulatory activity and not the general operations of the local government, and further provided that the local government shall not be required to establish separate accounts for such proceeds.

(b) Examples of businesses or practitioners of professions or occupations which may be subject to regulatory fees of local governments include, but are expressly not limited to, the following:

(1) Building and construction contractors, subcontractors, and workers;

(2) Carnivals;

(3) Taxicab and limousine operators;

(4) Tattoo artists;

(5) Stables;

(6) Reserved;

(7) Scrap metal processors;

(8) Pawnbrokers;

(9) Food service establishments;

(10) Dealers in precious metals;

(11) Reserved;

(12) Peddlers;

(13) Parking lots;

(14) Nursing homes, assisted living communities, and personal care homes;

SPECIFIC, BUSINESS, & OCCUPATION TAXES

(15) Newspaper vending boxes;

(16) Modeling agencies;

(17) Massage parlors;

(18) Landfills;

(19) Auto and motorcycle racing;

(20) Boarding houses;

(21) Businesses which provide appearance bonds;

(22) Boxing and wrestling promoters;

(23) Hotels and motels;

(24) Hypnotists;

(25) Handwriting analysts;

(26) Health clubs, gyms, and spas;

(27) Fortunetellers;

(28) Garbage collectors;

(29) Escort services;

(30) Burglar and fire alarm installers; and

(31) Locksmiths.

(c) Examples of businesses and practitioners of professions and occupations which local governments are not authorized to subject to regulatory fees include, but are expressly not limited to, the following:

(1) Lawyers;

(2) Physicians licensed under Chapter 34 of Title 43;

(3) Osteopaths licensed under Chapter 34 of Title 43;

(4) Chiropractors;

(5) Podiatrists;

(6) Dentists;

(7) Optometrists;

(8) Psychologists;

(9) Veterinarians;

(10) Landscape architects;

(11) Land surveyors;

(12) Practitioners of physiotherapy;

(13) Public accountants;

(13.1) Registered investment advisors;

(14) Embalmers;

(15) Funeral directors;

(16) Civil, mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical engineers;

(17) Architects;

(18) Marriage and family therapists, social workers, and professional counselors;

(19) Dealers of motor vehicles, as defined in paragraph (1) of Code Section 10-1-622;

(20) Owners or operators of bona fide coin operated amusement machines, as defined in Code Section 50-27-70, and owners or operators of businesses where bona fide coin operated amusement machines are available for commercial use and play by the public, provided that such amusement machines have affixed current stickers showing payment of annual permit fees, in accordance with Code Section 50-27-78;

(21) Merchants or dealers as defined in Code Section 48-5-354 as to their deliveries to businesses and practitioners of professions and occupations in areas zoned for commercial use;

(22) Shooting galleries and firearm ranges;

(23) Firearms dealers; and

(24) Any other business, profession, or occupation for which state licensure or registration is required by state law, unless the state law regulating such business, profession, or occupation specifically allows for regulation by local governments.

(d) This Code section shall not be construed to repeal other general laws which allow or require regulation of businesses, occupations, or professions by local governments.

(e) For each business, profession, or occupation, local governments are authorized to determine the amount of a regulatory fee imposed in accordance with this article only by one of the following methods:

(1) A flat fee for each business or practitioner of a profession or occupation doing business in the jurisdiction as authorized by Code Section 48-13-8;

(2) A flat fee for each type of permit or inspection requested;

SPECIFIC, BUSINESS, & OCCUPATION TAXES

(3) An hourly rate determined by the hourly wage or salary, including employee benefits, of the person or persons assigned to investigate or inspect multiplied by the number of hours estimated for the investigation or inspection to be performed;

(4) An hourly rate as determined by paragraph (3) of this subsection with the addition of other expenses reasonably related to such regulatory activity, such as administrative and travel expenses, multiplied by the number of hours estimated for the investigation or inspection to be performed; or

(5) For construction projects that are classified as new construction or for extensive renovation projects, the number of square feet of construction or the number of square feet of construction to be served by the system to be installed, in conjunction with the International Code Council or by similar data, and in conjunction with and limited by the hourly rate described in paragraph (3) or (4) of this subsection. As used in this paragraph, the term “extensive renovation project” means a project valued at $75,000.00 or more to renovate an existing structure.

History

Code 1981, § 48-13-9, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 1292, § 7; Ga. L. 1995, p. 419, § 1; Ga. L. 1999, p. 749, § 3; Ga. L. 2006, p. 544, § 2/HB 304; Ga. L. 2011, p. 227, § 28/SB 178; Ga. L. 2013, p. 37, § 2-3/HB 487; Ga. L. 2024, p. 661, § 1/HB 461, effective July 1, 2024. Amendments. The 2024 amendment, effective July 1, 2024, in subsection (a), substituted a comma for a semicolon following “purposes” and added “and the proceeds of such regulatory fee shall be used to fund such regulatory activity and not the general operations of the local government, and further provided that the local government shall not be required to establish separate accounts for such proceeds” at the end; substituted “Reserved” for “Shooting galleries and firearm ranges” in paragraph (b)(6); substituted “Reserved” for “Firearms dealers” in paragraph (b)(11); added paragraphs (c)(13.1), (c)(22), and (c)(23); deleted “and” from the end of paragraph (c)(21); redesignated former paragraph (c)(22) as paragraph (c)(24); added “or” at the end of paragraph (e)(4); in paragraph (e)(5), inserted “or for extensive renovation projects” near the beginning, deleted “and limited by the

building valuation data, as established from time to time by” preceding “the International Code Council”, deleted “; or” from the end, and added the second sentence; and, deleted paragraph (e)(6), which read: “For construction projects that are classified as renovation and all other construction projects other than those classified as new construction, the cost of the project in conjunction with and limited by the building valuation data that conforms with the principles and methods established from time to time by the International Code Council or by similar data, and in conjunction with and limited by the hourly rate described in paragraph (3) or (4) of this subsection.”

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1993, p. 1292, § 8, provided for the repeal of former Code Section 48-13-9, relating to county license fees for carnivals and other itinerant shows, effective January 1, 1995. That Code section was based on Ga. L. 1955, Ex. Sess., p. 17, § 1; Code 1933, § 91A-6005, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, § 2. Ga. L. 2013, p. 37, § 3-1/HB 487, not codified by the General Assembly, provides, in part, that: “(b) If any section of this Act is determined to be unconstitutional by a final decision of an

appellate court of competent jurisdiction or by the trial court of competent jurisdiction if no appeal is made, with the exception of subsection (g) of Code Section 50-27-78 and Section 2-1 of this Act, this Act shall stand repealed by operation of law. “(c) This Act is not intended to and shall not be construed to affect the legality of the repair, transport, possession, or use of otherwise prohibited gambling devices

on maritime vessels within the jurisdiction of the State of Georgia. To the extent that such repair, transport, possession, or use was lawful prior to the enactment of this Act, it shall not be made illegal by this Act; and to the extent that such repair, transport, possession, or use was prohibited prior to the enactment of this Act, it shall remain prohibited.” As of May 2024, no such finding has been issued.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Unconstitutional regulation of practice of law. - Occupational tax ordinance levied on professionals and requiring registration and a fee payment at the beginning of each year prior to the transaction of business operated as an unconstitutional precondition on the practice of law. Sexton v. City of Jonesboro, 267 Ga. 571, 481 S.E.2d 818, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 88 (1997). Annual renewal charge on Certificates of Public Necessity and Convenience held by taxicab drivers and companies is a regulatory fee, not a tax, and the charge is lawful because the city is authorized to regulate the business of operating taxicabs and vehicles for hire in which the certificates are used. Hadley v. City of Atlanta, 232 Ga. App. 871, 502 S.E.2d 784. Ordinance imposing an occupational tax. - Provisions in a city ordinance allowing the city to inspect an attorney’s financial records and to issue an execution to recover unpaid taxes due

constituted neither a precondition to the practice of law nor an attempt to regulate such practice because the city’s right to review the financial records did not require the production of material protected by attorney-client privilege and gross revenue statements were specifically protected from disclosure. Moss v. City of Dunwoody, 293 Ga. 858, 750 S.E.2d 326, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 868 (2013). Excessive fees. - Fact that the county had increased the county’s fees for building permits and other real estate development fees when the county had accumulated a two million dollar surplus from those fees was evidence that the fees may have exceeded the reasonable cost of the county’s regulatory activity, and summary judgment for the county was reversed in a case alleging a violation of O.C.G.A. § 48-13-9. Home Builders Ass’n of Savannah v. Chatham County, 276 Ga. 243, 577 S.E.2d 564, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 170 (2003).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1997–2020 · leading case: Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham Cnty., 577 S.E.2d 564 (Ga. 2003).
Home Builders Ass'n of Savannah, Inc. v. Chatham Cnty., 577 S.E.2d 564 (Ga. 2003). · cites it 6× “The multi-count complaint alleged an illegal tax; a deprivation of property without due process of law under both the Georgia and Federal Constitutions; a violation of OCGA § 48-13-9 (a) (regulatory fee must approximate the cost of regulatory activity performed); and violation…”
Hadley v. City of Atlanta, 502 S.E.2d 784 (Ga. Ct. App. 1998). · cites it 10× “It is also authorized under OCGA § 48-13-9 (b) (3) to impose regulatory fees upon taxicab and limousine operators.”
Sexton v. City of Jonesboro, 481 S.E.2d 818 (Ga. 1997). · cites it 4× “3 It requires professionals, as classified in OCGA § 48-13-9 (c) (1) through (18), to pay either a $400 flat fee, or a tax based upon gross receipts combined with profitability ratios as set forth in the ordinance.”
Atlanta Metro Leasing, Inc v. City of Atlanta (Ga. Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 2× “d municipal corporation may require the owner or operator of a taxicab or vehicle for hire to obtain a certificate of public necessity and convenience or medallion in order to operate such taxicab or vehicle for hire within the unincorporated areas of the county or within the…”
Moss v. City of Dunwoody, 750 S.E.2d 326 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 48-13-9 (c) (1). The question of whether an ordinance allowing for an occupation tax on attorneys impermissibly acts as a precondition or license for *860 engaging in the practice of law is one which this Court has considered numerous times and on which case law is…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.