O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 48-4-75 (2019)

Legislative findings

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The General Assembly finds that the nonpayment of ad valorem taxes by property owners effectively shifts a greater tax burden to property owners willing and able to pay their share of such taxes, that the failure to pay ad valorem taxes creates a significant barrier to neighborhood and urban revitalization, that significant tax delinquency creates barriers to marketability of the property, and that nonjudicial tax foreclosure procedures are inefficient, lengthy, and commonly result in title to real property which is neither marketable nor insurable. In addition, the General Assembly finds that tax delinquency in many instances results in properties which present health and safety hazards to the public. Consequently, the General Assembly further finds that the alternative to nonjudicial tax foreclosure procedures authorized by this article is an effective means of eliminating health and safety hazards by putting certain tax delinquent properties back on the tax rolls and into productive use.

History

Code 1981, § 48-4-75, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 272, § 1.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2013–2018 · leading case: Francis v. Scorpion Grp., LLC (In re Francis), 489 B.R. 262 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2013).
Francis v. Scorpion Grp., LLC (In re Francis), 489 B.R. 262 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2013). · cites it 4× “Third, although the Debtor seeks to “modify” the claim in terms of the period of time over which it is paid, the Debtor is not seeking and has not sought to modify Scorpion’s claim in terms of the amount due or payable.”
Derby Props., LLC v. J. W. \Bill\" Watson III (2018). “The legislature made this intent abundantly clear in OCGA § 48-4-75, which reads: The General Assembly finds that .”
Derby Props., LLC v. Watson, 816 S.E.2d 766 (2018). “The legislature made this intent abundantly clear in OCGA § 48-4-75, which reads: The General Assembly finds that .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.