O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 48-5-45 (2019)

Application for homestead exemption; unlawful to solicit fee to file application for homestead for another

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)(1) An applicant seeking a homestead exemption as provided in Code Section 48-5-44 and qualifying under the provisions of Code Section 48-5-40 shall file a written application and schedule with the tax receiver or tax commissioner charged with the duty of receiving returns of property for taxation at any time during the calendar year subsequent to the property becoming the primary residence of the applicant up to and including the date for the closing of the books for the return of taxes for the calendar year. (2) The failure to file properly the application and schedule on or before the date for the closing of the books for the return of taxes of a calendar year in which the taxes are due shall constitute a waiver of the homestead exemption on the part of the applicant failing to make the application for such exemption for that year. (b) The owner of a homestead which is actually occupied by the owner as a residence and homestead shall not have to apply for the exemption more than once so long as the owner remains in continuous occupation of the residence as a homestead. The exemption shall automatically be renewed from year to year so long as the owner continuously occupies the residence as a homestead. (c) It is unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to solicit, either directly or by mail or advertisement, any other person for the purpose of filing on behalf of such other person the application and schedule for homestead exemption required by this Code section if a fee is charged for filing such application and schedule on behalf of such other person. A violation of this subsection shall be a misdemeanor.

History

Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 145, § 2; Ga. L. 1943, p. 101, § 1; Ga. L. 1945, p. 435, § 1; Ga. L. 1952, p. 317, § 1; Code 1933, § 91A-1111, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, § 2; Ga. L. 1979, p. 538, § 2; Ga. L.

1979, p. 830, § 1,; Ga. L. 1981, p. 528, §§ 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3,§ 48; Ga. L. 1982, p. 531, § 2; Ga. L. 1982, p. 575, §§ 2. 9; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1108, § 2; Ga. L. 1983, p. 1849, §§ 2, 3; Ga. L. 1984, p. 22, § 48; Ga. L. 1992, p. 1190, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 507,

§ 1; Ga. L 1997, p. 963, § 2; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1651, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 1087, § 1; Ga. L. 2004, p. 455, § 2; Ga. L. 2008, p. 229, § 1/SB 159.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1979, p. 830, § 2 provides that in the event of any conflict between Ga. L. 1979, p. 830, and Ga. L. 1978, p. 309, the 1979 Act shall prevail. Ga. L. 1997, p. 963, § 5, not codified by

the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section is applicable to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1998. Ga. L. 1998, p. 1651, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section is applicable to taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1999.

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL Time for filing application for homestead exemption may not be extended. 1945-47 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 562. Removal of owner from residence subsequent to January 1 does not make the owner ineligible to claim homestead exemption. 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 748. Automatic renewal applies only to home originally exempted. - Statute provides for automatic renewal of homestead exemption of the taxpayer so long as the taxpayer continues to occupy the previously exempted property as a home. If the applicant sells the applicant’s home and occupies a new home, it would be necessary for the applicant to file a new application for homestead exemption. The automatic renewal is limited to the property actually exempted in the original instance so long as the owner continues to occupy the property as a home. 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 748. Exemption automatically renewed even if taxpayer files no return. - Homestead exemption of $2,000.00 need be applied for only one time. Even though the taxpayer fails to file a return, the assessor must credit the taxpayer with the $2,000.00 homestead exemption, so long as the taxpayer continues to occupy such property as the taxpayer’s residence. 1957 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 293. Application must be made and is not inferred solely from return. - Homestead exemption must be applied for and is not granted solely on the basis of information contained in the tax return. 1957 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 292. When taxpayer originally applied for less than the full allowable

homestead exemption, and when the taxpayer has not reapplied but relied on automatic renewal, and when the taxpayer’s property has been revalued upward, the county board of assessors may raise the homestead exemption and should do so, as the taxpayer has not waived any part of the full exemption provided in Ga. Const. 1945, Art. VII, Sec. I, Para. IV (see now Ga. Const. 1983, Art. VII, Sec. II, Para. I-IV). 1963-65 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 142. Absence from residence because of duty in the armed forces is not a waiver of the homestead exemption, provided the tax receiver or tax commissioner is notified. 1945-47 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 561. Necessity for application and automatic renewal by persons in the armed service. - Statute provides that a person shall not be obligated to apply for the exemption but one time so long as such owner remains in continuous occupation of such residence as a homestead. This language would indicate that there must have been at least one application. However, when a homestead is granted without an application due to the fact that the taxpayer was in the armed services, since eligibility was established by virtue of being in the armed services, eligibility would continue so long as the taxpayer owns and occupies the property as a home. 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 727. Duty of taxpayer to make homestead application personally. - Filing of a homestead exemption is a personal privilege and a taxpayer who requested the tax receiver to make for the taxpayer a homestead exemption application, and who has not filed the

taxpayer’s return, is liable for the penalty. 1948-49 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 669. It is necessary to file annually to obtain a homestead exemption on personal property. 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 725; 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 743. Statute makes no provision for automatic renewal of a homestead exemption on personal property. In order to obtain a homestead exemption on personal property, it is necessary to make a tax return and file an application

therefor as provided by law. 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 742; 1957 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 293. Penalty on late return is figured on tax due over and above homestead exemption. - After the taxpayer has once filed for a homestead exemption on real property, it is automatically renewed. Therefore, the penalty for filing a late return is on the tax due on property over and above the homestead exemption. 1954-56 Ga. Op. Att’y Gen. 725.

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 40 C.J.S., Homesteads, § 41.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1984–2010 · leading case: Tec Am., Inc. v. DeKalb Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors, 317 S.E.2d 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984).
Tec Am., Inc. v. DeKalb Cnty. Bd. of Tax Assessors, 317 S.E.2d 637 (Ga. Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “See OCGA § 48-5-45 (a). It was not until the enactment of OCGA § 48-5-48.”
Brown Inv. Grp., LLC v. Mayor of Savannah, 695 S.E.2d 331 (Ga. Ct. App. 2010). · cites it 2× “1 The complaint, filed on May 22, 2008, alleged that Brown Investment obtained legal title to the property by acquiring the August 1, 2006 tax deed and foreclosing the right of redemption in April 2008 by giving the notice required under OCGA § 48-5-45. Nat. Tax Funding v.…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.