Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §48-5-48.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1982, p. 1101, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 37; Ga. L. 1984, p. 1371, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 2482, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 963, § 3; Ga. L. 1998, p. 128, § 48; Ga. L. 1998, p. 1120, § 1A; Ga. L. 1999, p. 81, § 48; Ga. L. 2004, p. 464, § 1; Ga. L. 2012, p. 249, § 1/HB 48; Ga. L. 2016, p. 731, § 1/HB 935; Ga. L. 2017, p. 774, § 48/HB 323; Ga. L. 2018, p. 986, § 1/HB 888.)
The 2016 amendment, effective July 1, 2016, in subsection (b), deleted "and" at the end of paragraph (b)(2), substituted "; and" for a period at the end of paragraph (b)(3), and added paragraph (b)(4).
The 2017 amendment, effective May 9, 2017, part of an Act to revise, modernize, and correct the Code, substituted "January 1 is stored" for "January 1 are stored" in the first sentence of paragraph (b)(4).
The 2018 amendment, effective May 8, 2018, substituted "summary" for "schedule" in the middle of the first sentence of subsection (a) and near the middle of subparagraph (c)(2)(A); substituted "summary, as prescribed by the department," for "schedule" near the beginning of paragraphs (b)(1) through (b)(4); in paragraph (c)(1), substituted "completed application" for "application and complete schedule of the inventory" in the first sentence and added the second sentence; substituted "completed application" for "application and schedule" near the middle of the introductory paragraph of paragraph (c)(2), near the beginning of subparagraph (c)(2)(B), and near the end of the last sentence of subsection (e); in subparagraph (c)(2)(B), substituted "completed application is filed" for "application and schedule are filed" in the middle, and substituted "unless such completed application is filed" for "unless the application and schedule are filed" in the proviso; and, in subsection (d), inserted ", not later than 180 days after receiving the application," in the middle of the second sentence and added the last sentence.
- Ga. L. 1997, p. 963, § 5, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section is applicable to all taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 1998.
Ga. L. 2012, p. 249, § 5/HB 48, not codified by the General Assembly, provides for severability.
- For article, "Freeport Exemption from Property Taxes for Inventory Stored in Georgia But Destined for Shipment Out-of-State," see 28 Ga. St. B. J. 108 (1991).
- When "freeport" exemption was approved by voters, and at all times relevant to the instant appeal there was no state statutory provisions specifying that the exemption from taxation which had otherwise been granted to inventories was conditioned upon the taxpayer's timely filing of an application therefor, the subsequent enactment of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-48.1 calling for a timely filing in order to obtain the exemption was intended to change the existing law; therefore, the procedure denying an exemption for untimely filings used by the county board of tax assessors prior to the statutory addition was not an authorized penalty under state law. TEC Am., Inc. v. DeKalb County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 170 Ga. App. 533, 317 S.E.2d 637 (1984).
Failure to receive the application for exemption form does not excuse the taxpayer from meeting the taxpayer's burden to file the application. Rockdale County v. Finishline Indus., Inc., 238 Ga. App. 467, 518 S.E.2d 720 (1999).
- When the only proof of timely mailing of applications for exemption was testimony of the corporation's tax specialist that the specialist placed the envelopes in the mailbox in the corporation's home office, and since the envelopes were not imprinted with U.S. Postal Service postmarks, but contained private postage meter stamps, the applications were untimely filed and the exemption was waived. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Makita Corp. of Am., 218 Ga. App. 175, 460 S.E.2d 538 (1995).
- It was arbitrary and capricious for a board of tax assessors to refuse, under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-48.1(c)(2)(B), to allow a taxpayer to retroactively amend a timely filed and valid freeport exemption when the board changed the board's valuation method. William L. Bonnell Co. v. Coweta County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 252 Ga. App. 151, 556 S.E.2d 159 (2001).
Taxpayer's understatement of value of personal property did not preclude taking the freeport exemption. Georgian Art Lighting Designs, Inc. v. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 211 Ga. App. 510, 439 S.E.2d 687 (1993).
Since the parties stipulated that the county tax assessors board denied the taxpayer an exemption from ad valorem taxation of certain tangible personal property based on an undervaluation of its inventory, since the taxpayer properly filed for the exemption, and because statutory law stated that the exemption was waived for failing to report inventory, and not an undervaluation of inventory, the trial court properly granted summary judgment to the taxpayer on the issue of whether the county equalization board properly determined that the taxpayer was entitled to the exemption. Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Std. Distrib. & Supply, 263 Ga. App. 128, 587 S.E.2d 262 (2003).
- Court could find no statutory basis under state law to excuse an untimely filing of a freeport application by a debtor in bankruptcy. Scana Energy Mktg., Inc. v. Cobb Energy Mgmt. Corp., 259 Ga. App. 216, 576 S.E.2d 548 (2002).
- Freeport exemption from ad valorem taxes did not apply to a taxpayer's inventory of barbecue grill bodies because the taxpayer's involvement with the grill bodies ended when the taxpayer sold the grill bodies to a producer of barbecue grills, and the final destination of the grill bodies was the producer's plant; the producer incorporated the grill bodies into finished barbecue grills, and it was the completed barbecue grills that the producer eventually shipped out of state. Muscogee County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Pace Indus., 307 Ga. App. 532, 705 S.E.2d 678 (2011).
- County board of tax assessors was not authorized to extend the period of time for accepting applications beyond the date on which the books for the return of taxes in the county were closed. Committee for Better Gov't v. Black, 216 Ga. App. 173, 453 S.E.2d 772 (1995).
- Under O.C.G.A. § 48-5-48.1(a), the entity seeking the freeport exemption is required to file a written application and schedule of the property for which the exemption is sought; thus, the statutory scheme looks to the property, that is, the inventory, held by the taxpayer, and what becomes of the inventory in the hands of a purchaser from the taxpayer is not relevant to the determination of the availability of the freeport exemption. Muscogee County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Pace Indus., 307 Ga. App. 532, 705 S.E.2d 678 (2011).
Cited in Fulton County Tax Comm'r v. GMC, 234 Ga. App. 459, 507 S.E.2d 772 (1998); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Clayton County Bd. of Tax Assessors, 246 Ga. App. 225, 539 S.E.2d 905 (2000); Gwinnett County Bd. of Tax Assessors v. Std. Distrib. & Supply, 263 Ga. App. 128, 587 S.E.2d 262 (2003).
- Taxpayer who fails to file a timely application for the freeport inventory exemption in accordance with the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 48-5-48.1 has waived that exemption for the tax year. 1987 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U87-7.
Deductibility of Home Office Expenses, 38 POF2d 555.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-06-27
Citation: 264 Ga. 309, 444 S.E.2d 771, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 2137, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 467
Snippet: freeport exemption on its inventory. See OCGA § 48-5-48.1. However, appellee’s return was postmarked March