O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 49-4-18 (2019)

Article construed with federal Social Security Act; adoption of rules to comply with federal act

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the intention of the General Assembly that this article be construed consistent with the federal Social Security Act, and any provision of this article found to be in conflict with the federal Social Security Act shall be deemed to be void and of no effect. It is further the intention of the General Assembly, in view of the joint state and federal financial participation in the assistance programs, that the department shall be authorized to adopt such regulations as may be necessary to comply with the requirements of the federal Social Security Act.

History

Ga. L. 1965, p. 385, § 16. U.S. Code. The federal Social Security Act, referred

to in this Code section, is codified at 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. Judicial questions regarding Federal Social Security Act and state legislation adopted in anticipation of or after the passage of that act, to set up “state plan” contemplated by it, 100 A.L.R. 697; 106

A.L.R. 243; 108 A.L.R. 613; 109 A.L.R. 1346; 118 A.L.R. 1220; 121 A.L.R. 1002. Validity of statutes or regulations denying welfare benefits to claimants who transfer property for less than its full value, 24 A.L.R.4th 215.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1985–1985 · leading case: Cox v. Dep't of Human Resources, 334 S.E.2d 683 (Ga. 1985).
Cox v. Dep't of Human Resources, 334 S.E.2d 683 (Ga. 1985). · cites it 4× “OCGA § 49-4-18 provides that it is the intention of the General Assembly that the Act "be construed consistent with the federal Social Security Act.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.