Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448It is the intention of the General Assembly that this article be construed consistent with the federal Social Security Act, and any provision of this article found to be in conflict with the federal Social Security Act shall be deemed to be void and of no effect. It is further the intention of the General Assembly, in view of the joint state and federal financial participation in the assistance programs, that the department shall be authorized to adopt such regulations as may be necessary to comply with the requirements of the federal Social Security Act.
(Ga. L. 1965, p. 385, § 16.)
- The federal Social Security Act, referred to in this Code section, is codified at 42 U.S.C. § 301 et seq.
Cited in James v. Harden, 136 Ga. App. 207, 221 S.E.2d 67 (1975); Cox v. Dep't of Human Resources, 255 Ga. 6, 334 S.E.2d 683 (1985).
- Judicial questions regarding Federal Social Security Act and state legislation adopted in anticipation of or after the passage of that act, to set up "state plan" contemplated by it, 100 A.L.R. 697; 106 A.L.R. 243; 108 A.L.R. 613; 109 A.L.R. 1346; 118 A.L.R. 1220; 121 A.L.R. 1002.
Validity of statutes or regulations denying welfare benefits to claimants who transfer property for less than its full value, 24 A.L.R.4th 215.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1985-10-01
Citation: 334 S.E.2d 683, 255 Ga. 6, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 866
Snippet: Social Security Act.” Ga. Laws 1965, p. 385. OCGA § 49-4-18 provides that it is the intention of the General