Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
The short title of this article shall be “Georgia Public Assistance Act of 1965.”
History
Ga. L. 1965, p. 385, § 1.
Annotations
Law reviews. - For note discussing the denial of social security benefits to dependent children pursuant to substitute father provisions as violative of due process, prior to the 1967 amendments to the Georgia Public Assistance Act (O.C.G.A. § 49-4-1 et seq.), see 15 J. of Pub. L. 349 (1966).
Fedina v. Larichev, 744 S.E.2d 72 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2ד” GDHS filed a motion to quash the request, arguing that the requested documents are statutorily restricted by OCGA § 49-4-1 *78 et seq. and by federal guidelines limiting the disclosure of public assistance records.”
So v. Ledbetter, 434 S.E.2d 517 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2ד868, 869 ( 275 SE2d 807 )) provided under the Georgia Public Assistance Act, OCGA § 49-4-1 et seq. Thus, although OCGA § 49-2-11 (c) authorizes DHR to promulgate rules and regulations for the WIC program, under the Georgia Administrative Procedures Act (“APA”), OCGA § 50-13-3 et…”
Floyd Cnty. Grand Jury v. Dep't of Fam. & Child. Servs., 463 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2ד…all categories of public assistance (OCGA §§ 49-2-6; 49-4-3 (b)) under the Georgia Public Assistance Act of 1965 (OCGA § 49-4-1 et seq.), including administration and supervision of public assistance provided by county departments (OCGA § 49-2-6 (a)). Each county…”
Yuliya Fedina v. Alexei Larichev (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2ד” GDHS filed a motion to quash the request, arguing that the requested documents are statutorily restricted by OCGA § 49-4-1 et seq. and by federal guidelines limiting the disclosure of public assistance records.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.