O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 5-3-4 (2019)

Appeal by one of several plaintiffs or defendants - Authorization and procedure generally

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When there is more than one party plaintiff or defendant, and one or more of the parties plaintiff or defendant desire to appeal, and the others refuse or fail to appeal, the party plaintiff or defendant desiring to appeal may enter an appeal in the manner provided by law. (Laws Page: 184 GA RV 13 RV 4(T4-6) - EP Date: 06/14/13 Time: 10:58:26 1839, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 500; Code 1863, § 3539; Code 1868, § 3562; Code 1873, § 3619; Code 1882, § 3619; Civil Code 1895, § 4461; Civil Code 1910, § 5006; Code 1933, § 6-110; Ga. L. 1995, p. 10, § 5.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Parties to appeal. - Although only one of the coparties appeals, all of the coparties who have the same interests and rights are also a party to the appeal. Hunt v. Henderson, 178 Ga. App. 688, 344 S.E.2d 470 (1986). Right of all parties to prosecute or defend. - All parties who are brought up on appeal, whether they have filed an appeal or not have the right to appear and prosecute or defend, whichever the case may be. Hunt v. Henderson, 178 Ga. App. 688, 344 S.E.2d 470 (1986). Section inapplicable to certiorari cases, but applies to appeals only. Winn v. Ingram, 3 Ga. App. 628, 60 S.E. 328 (1908). Suits against several defendants jointly. - Section inapplicable where several defendants jointly sued are discharged and remaining defendant held liable. It is otherwise if judgment below

was rendered against all defendants. Patterson v. Barrow, 99 Ga. 166, 25 S.E. 398 (1896). Defendant cannot enter appeal from only part of judgment. Bryson v. Scott, 111 Ga. 196, 36 S.E. 619 (1900). Where nonappealing defendant dies between first and second trial. - Where one of three defendants enters appeal under section, and one of other two dies, between first and second trial, he was a party to appeal, so far as to require his legal representative to be made a party to cause before it can proceed. Stell v. Glass, 1 Ga. 475 (1846). Cited in Powell v. Perry, 63 Ga. 417 (1879); Metzer v. Steed, 132 Ga. 822, 65 S.E. 117 (1909); Marks v. Steinberg, 55 Ga. App. 561, 190 S.E. 808 (1937); Colley v. Dillon, 158 Ga. App. 416, 280 S.E.2d 425 (1981).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Appellate Review, § 231 et seq. C.J.S. - 4 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, §§ 237 et seq., 325 et seq. ALR. - May new trial or reversal for error as to measure of damages against

one or more of the parties be restricted to those parties, 32 ALR 255. Right to perfect appeal, against party who has not appealed, by cross appeal filed after time for direct appeal has passed, 32 ALR3d 1290.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49 cases (48 in the last 5 years), 1986–2026 · leading case: Hunt v. Henderson, 344 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).
Hunt v. Henderson, 344 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 4× “Under OCGA § 5-3-4, “[w]hen there is more than one party plaintiff or defendant, and one or more of the parties plaintiff or defendant desires to appeal, and the others refuse or fail to appeal, the party plaintiff or defendant desiring to appeal may enter an appeal in the…”
In Re Est. of Kitty Hk Felker (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “In response, Perez filed a motion to dismiss the appeal in which he asserted that the superior court did not have jurisdiction over the appeal because pursuant to OCGA § 5-3-4 the superior court does not have jurisdiction over “[a] civil case in an Article 6 probate court.”
L. River James v. Developers-Investors, Inc (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Carneisha King v. Kenridge Nmf, LLC Dba Kenridge Apts. (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Tiffany Stallworth v. Sreit Lakewoood Villas Atl LLC. (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Kim Camille Florence v. Tenisha Deshawn Thomas (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Jerome Smallwood v. Cjp Holding Inc (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Michael Mooney v. Xinyi Zheng (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Thaddeus Williams v. Bfg Spanish LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2×
Karen Johnson v. Progress Residential (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “]” Because Johnson filed this application for discretionary appeal 17 days after the trial court’s order, she has failed to comply with a jurisdictional prerequisite to appeal a dispossessory ruling.”
Kim Camille Florence v. Zoe Danielle Couture (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 2× “4443, 4454, § 33 (c); see also OCGA § 5-3-4 (b) (2).”
— 5-3-4(a) — 16 cases
Adria Blalock v. Kbc Ventures (Ga. Ct. App. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.