O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 5-3-7 (2019)

Appeal suspends judgment; effect of dismissal or withdrawal of appeal

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

An appeal shall suspend but not vacate a judgment and, if dismissed or withdrawn, the rights of all the parties shall be the same as if no appeal had been entered.

History

(Orig. Code 1863, § 3549; Code 1868, § 3572; Code 1873, § 3628; Code 1882, § 3628; Civil Code 1895, § 4470; Civil Code 1910, § 5015; Code 1933, § 6-502.)

Annotations

Cross references. - Similar provisions regarding suspension of judgment by appeal, § 9-12-19. JUDICIAL DECISIONS Justice’s court judgment remains operative, but incapable of enforcement pending appeal. Haygood v. King, 161 Ga. 732, 132 S.E. 62 (1926); Tilley v. King, 193 Ga. 602, 19 S.E.2d 281 (1942), later appeal, 69 Ga. App. 561, 26 S.E.2d 293 (1943). Effect of statute is to preserve all incidents of judgment except right to enforce the judgment by sale of defendant’s property pending appeal. Watkins v. Angier, 99 Ga. 519, 27 S.E. 718 (1896). Dismissal of appeal by superior court for want of jurisdiction renders county court’s judgment final. Johnson v. Ford, 92 Ga. 751, 19 S.E. 712 (1894). Effect of dismissal of appeal to superior court from judgment of court of ordinary (now probate court) admitting will to probate was to make effective judgment of court of ordinary. Hooks v. Hooks, 197 Ga. 482, 29 S.E.2d 599 (1944). Appellant cannot, without adverse party’s consent, certify case back to inferior court. - In appeal from inferior court, or assessors in condemnation proceeding, to superior court, the law contemplates that if judgment is obtained in superior court the prevailing party is entitled to superior court execution and aid of all processes of superior court to enforce the court’s judgment. A dismissal of the entire case or proceedings with consent of court might be permissible under some circumstances, for this would be a final termination of the entire case or proceedings, but appellant cannot, at will and without consent of the adverse party, certify the case back to the inferior court, or to assessors, and relegate adverse party to processes of inferior court. Such would be the effect of allowing appellant to withdraw the appeal without consent of the adverse party contrary to provisions of former Code 1933, § 6-503 (see O.C.G.A. § 5-3-8). State Hwy. Bd. v. Long, 61 Ga. App. 173, 6 S.E.2d 130 (1939). Dismissal by appealing party. - The appealing party cannot dismiss the appeal

to the prejudice of his coparties, as their rights on appeal are equal to those of the party making the appeal. Hunt v. Henderson, 178 Ga. App. 688, 344 S.E.2d 470 (1986). Distinction between dismissing case on appeal and dismissing appeal. - Difference must be noted between dismissing case on appeal and dismissing an appeal. The first dismissal lets out whole case while second is an affirmance of judgment below and rights of all parties are same as if no appeal had been entered. Fagan v. McTier, 81 Ga. 73, 6 S.E. 177 (1888); State Hwy. Bd. v. Long, 61 Ga. App. 173, 6 S.E.2d 130 (1939). While appeal only suspends and does not vacate judgment allowing probate in solemn form, so that judgment may again become effective in event of dismissal of appeal, a dismissal of the case vitiates entire proceeding, leaving parties in same status as if no action was ever commenced to probate in solemn form. Hodges v. Libbey, 120 Ga. App. 246, 170 S.E.2d 37 (1969). Time period that lien of judgment is binding. - Where on appeal from judgment in justice’s court appellee is successful, lien of judgment will be taken as binding from date of its original rendition, and entitled to superiority over subsequently rendered judgment, notwithstanding provisions of § 9-12-88. Tilley v. King, 193 Ga. 602, 19 S.E.2d 281 (1942), later appeal, 69 Ga. App. 561, 26 S.E.2d 293 (1943). Where plaintiff, appellee, obtains judgment on appeal, such judgment, as to priority, is to be treated as being of date when judgment appealed from was entered, and accordingly it takes precedence over another judgment rendered by superior court, older than judgment on appeal, but younger than original judgment entered in justice’s court. Watkins v. Angier, 99 Ga. 519, 27 S.E. 718 (1896). Property bought by defendant before entry of judgment on justice’s

Page: 188

GA RV 13 RV 4(T4-6) - EP

docket is bound by subsequent judgment in superior court. Dodd & Co. v. Glover, 102 Ga. 82, 29 S.E. 158 (1897). Statute of limitations does not run while appeal is pending. - Statute of limitations does not run in favor of plaintiff in error as to judgment in justice’s court, and execution cannot be issued upon such judgment pending appeal in superior court. Twitty v. Bower, 84 Ga. 751, 11 S.E. 354 (1890). Cited in Robinson v. Medlock, 59 Ga. 598 (1877); East Tenn., V. & Ga. R.R. v.

Date: 06/14/13 Time: 10:58:26

Miles, 72 Ga. 252 (1884); Rasberry v. Harville, 90 Ga. 530, 16 S.E. 299 (1892); Reagan v. Powell, 125 Ga. 89, 53 S.E. 580 (1906); Jones v. Cannady, 78 Ga. App. 453, 51 S.E.2d 551 (1949); Garrison v. McGuire, 114 Ga. App. 665, 152 S.E.2d 624 (1966); Anderson v. Burnham, 12 Bankr. 286 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1981); Nelson v. Smothers, 168 Ga. App. 120, 308 S.E.2d 239 (1983); Williamson v. Lucas, 78 Bankr. 372 (Bankr. M.D. Ga. 1987); Georgia Mental Health Inst. v. Brady, 263 Ga. 591, 436 S.E.2d 219 (1993).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 5 Am. Jur. 2d, Appellate Review, §§ 387 et seq., 543, 814. C.J.S. - 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, § 748 et seq. ALR. - First decision of intermediate court as law of the case on appeal to court of last resort from subsequent decision, 41 ALR 1078; 118 ALR 1286. Judgment in tort action as subject of assignment, attachment, or garnishment pending appeal, 121 ALR 420. Running of limitations against proceeding to renew or revive judgment as affected by appeal or right of appeal from judgment, or by motion or right to move for new trial, 123 ALR 565. Liability of insurer under policy indemnifying against liability or loss as affected

by pendency of appeal or motion for new trial from judgment against insured or by the fact that time for appeal or motion for new trial has not expired, 125 ALR 755. Decree on bill of review reversing prior decree as affecting purchaser or mortgagee of real property in the interval between the original decree and the filing of the bill of review, 150 ALR 676. Defeated party’s payment or satisfaction of, or other compliance with, civil judgment as barring his right to appeal, 39 ALR2d 153. Conviction from which appeal is pending as bar to another prosecution for same offense, 61 ALR2d 1224. Judgment subject to appeal as entitled to full faith and credit, 2 ALR3d 1384.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1983–2026 · leading case: Long v. Greenwood Homes, Inc., 679 S.E.2d 712 (Ga. 2009).
Long v. Greenwood Homes, Inc., 679 S.E.2d 712 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 40× “Appellee Greenwood Homes filed a motion for summary judgment in the renewal action, contending that, under OCGA § 5-3-7, the voluntary dismissal effectively reinstated the judgment entered by the magistrate court.”
Georgia Mental Health Inst. v. Brady, 436 S.E.2d 219 (Ga. 1993). · cites it 4× “GMHI from appealing an adverse probate court decision on commitment and thus leads to an affirmance of the trial court's grant of habeas corpus and injunctive relief to Brady, we nevertheless address GMHI's contention that it had the right to restrain Brady pending the appeal…”
Greenwood Homes, Inc. v. Long, 666 S.E.2d 450 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 8× “Greenwood Homes moved for summary judgment, arguing that once Long dismissed her appeal, the magistrate court judgment became final under OCGA § 5-3-7, and Long cannot now avail herself of the renewal statute.”
Hunt v. Henderson, 344 S.E.2d 470 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 5-3-7. “An appeal to the superior *690 court from .”
Nelson v. Smothers, 308 S.E.2d 239 (Ga. Ct. App. 1983). · cites it 4× “See OCGA §§ 5-3-7 (Code Ann. § 6-502), 9-12-89 (Code Ann.”
Thaddeus Williams v. Bfg Spanish LLC (Ga. Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 4× “VIII (“[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere”); OCGA § 5-3-4 (a) (granting superior and state courts appellate jurisdiction over final judgments of lower judicatories).…”
Daniel Chavis v. McDowell Props. of Ga, LLC D/B/A Alexander Crossing (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “VIII (“[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere”); OCGA § 5-3-4 (a) (granting superior and state courts appellate jurisdiction over final judgments of lower judicatories).…”
Tijonna Holmes v. Ga Ivy Commons, LLC D/B/A Ivy Commons (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “Under the circumstances of this case, however, a transfer is inappropriate for at least two reasons.”
Mikaylah Dixon v. Solstice Atl, LLC D/B/A Solstice Apts. (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “VIII (“[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere”); OCGA § 5-3-4(a) (granting superior and state courts appellate jurisdiction over final judgments of lower judicatories). Like…”
April Campbell v. Columbia Park Citi (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “VIII (“[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere”); OCGA § 5-3-4(a) (granting superior and state courts appellate jurisdiction over final judgments of lower judicatories). Like…”
Wayne Bridges v. Portfino Owner LLC d/b/a Mirador at Idlewood (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “VIII (“[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere”); OCGA § 5-3-4(a) (granting superior and state courts appellate jurisdiction over final judgments of lower judicatories). Like…”
Dante Bell v. Ch Realty X-Penier Mf Atlanta Eleven 85, LLC D/B/A Eleven 85 (Ga. Ct. App. 2026). · cites it 4× “VIII (“[a]ny court shall transfer to the appropriate court in the state any civil case in which it determines that jurisdiction or venue lies elsewhere”); OCGA § 5-3-4(a) (granting superior and state courts appellate jurisdiction over final judgments of lower judicatories). Like…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.