O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 5-7-1.1 (2019)

Right of state to direct appeal in certain delinquency cases

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Ga. L. 2000, p. 862, § 3, effective July 1, 2000.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. - This Code section was based on Ga. L. 1994, p. 856, § 1.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 5 cases, 1995–1999 · leading case: In the Interest of J. H., 491 S.E.2d 209 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

In the Interest of J. H., 491 S.E.2d 209 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 6× “OCGA § 5-7-1.1 specificálly delineates the circumstances under which the State may appeal a decision in a delinquency case: “An appeal may be taken by and on behalf of the State of Georgia from the juvenile courts and such other courts from which a direct appeal is authorized to…”

Glenn v. State, 523 S.E.2d 13 (Ga. 1999). · cites it 2× “1 See also OCGA § 5-7-1.1, which governs the State’s right of appeal in delinquency cases.”

In the Interest of R. D. F., 455 S.E.2d 77 (Ga. Ct. App. 1995). · cites it 2× “The State appeals pursuant to OCGA § 5-7-1.1 1 OCGA § 15-11-26 (a) provides that: “After the petition has been filed the court shall fix a time for hearing thereon, which, if the child is in detention, shall not be later than ten days after the filing of the petition.”

in the Interest of M. J. H., 522 S.E.2d 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The State appeals under OCGA § 5-7-1.1 (2). We agree with the trial court that the police officer lacked the required reasonable and articulable suspicion to make a brief investigative stop of M.”

In Re Mjh, 522 S.E.2d 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “The State appeals under OCGA § 5-7-1.1(2). We agree with the trial court that the police officer lacked the required reasonable and articulable suspicion to make a brief investigative stop of M.”

— 5-7-1.1(2) — 1 case

In Re Mjh, 522 S.E.2d 491 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). “The State appeals under OCGA § 5-7-1.1(2). We agree with the trial court that the police officer lacked the required reasonable and articulable suspicion to make a brief investigative stop of M.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.