O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 50-13-22 (2019)

Construction of chapter

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Nothing in this chapter shall be held to diminish the constitutional rights of any person, to limit or repeal additional requirements imposed by statute or otherwise recognized by law, to diminish any delegation of authority to any agency, nor to create any substantive rights; but this chapter shall be procedural. Except as otherwise required by law, all requirements or privileges relating to evidence or procedure shall apply equally to agencies and persons. Every agency is granted all authority necessary to comply with the requirements of this chapter through the issuance of rules or otherwise.

History

Ga. L. 1964, p. 338, § 22; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 50.

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant

to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1986, a comma was substituted for a semicolon following ‘‘law’’ in the second sentence.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Pope v. Cokinos, 231 Ga. 79, 200 S.E.2d 275 (1973); Georgia Real Es-

tate Comm’n v. Horne, 141 Ga. App. 226, 233 S.E.2d 16 (1977).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1997–1997 · leading case: Rowell v. State, 494 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997).
Rowell v. State, 494 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “Rowell argues that the State’s failure to comply with the procedural requirements of the APA deprived him of due process.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.