Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 51-7-46 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 51-7-46 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 51-7-46

TITLE 51 TORTS

Section 7. False Arrest, False Imprisonment, Malicious Prosecution, and Abusive Litigation, 51-7-1 through 51-7-85.

ARTICLE 3 MALICIOUS PROSECUTION

51-7-46. Immunity of grand jurors from action for malicious prosecution; liability of person instigating presentment.

  1. No member of a grand jury shall be subject to an action for malicious prosecution based upon a presentment made by the grand jury.
  2. If a presentment is made at the instigation of a third person, from malice on his part and without probable cause, he shall be liable to an action for malicious prosecution just as if he were named as prosecutor.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 2927; Code 1868, § 2934; Code 1873, § 2985; Code 1882, § 2985; Civil Code 1895, § 3846; Civil Code 1910, § 4442; Code 1933, § 105-807.)

Cross references.

- Grand juries generally, § 15-12-60 et seq.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Grand jury immune from malicious prosecution action.

- The grand jury as a body and its members individually, being an arm of the law and a part of the machinery of government, are not subject to question in any court for its or their action in the performance of grand jury duties, and no rule of law of which the court has any knowledge is better settled than this. Cook v. Sikes, 210 Ga. 722, 82 S.E.2d 641 (1954).

As to grand jury, no writ of prohibition will lie since it is not an inferior court. Almand v. Brock, 227 Ga. 586, 182 S.E.2d 97 (1971).

Defendant officer did not instigate prosecution of plaintiff.

- Because the undisputed facts of the second officer's limited participation as a backup officer did not amount to the "instigation" that would cause the second officer to be named as a "prosecutor" in a claim of malicious prosecution under Georgia law, the malicious prosecution claim against the second officer was required to be dismissed. Proescher v. Bell, 966 F. Supp. 2d 1350 (N.D. Ga. Aug. 21, 2013).

Cited in Thornton v. Marshall, 92 Ga. 548, 17 S.E. 926 (1893).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 38 Am. Jur. 2d, Grand Jury, § 38.

C.J.S.

- 3B C.J.S., Grand Juries, § 224.

ALR.

- Immunity of prosecuting officer from action for malicious prosecution, 34 A.L.R. 1504; 56 A.L.R. 1255; 118 A.L.R. 1450.

Liability of attorney, acting for client, for malicious prosecution, 46 A.L.R.4th 249.

No results found for Georgia Code 51-7-46.