Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(4.1) To board vessels in use or floating, whether moored or not, for purposes of examining any marine toilets, holding tanks, and documents related to them, including records of pump-out and certificates of compliance, and to search without warrant any such vessel to determine compliance with the provisions of this article related to marine toilets when the officer believes that any of said provisions of this article relating to marine toilets have been violated;
(Ga. L. 1960, p. 235, § 12; Ga. L. 1973, p. 1427, § 23; Ga. L. 1977, p. 1182, § 12; Ga. L. 1980, p. 738, §§ 14-17; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1343, § 4.)
- Acceptance of cash bonds for violation of boating laws, § 17-6-5 et seq.
Powers and duties of conservation rangers with regard to laws pertaining to boating safety, § 27-1-20.
Authority of agents of Georgia Bureau of Investigation to enforce laws relating to operation of vessels or boats upon waters of state, § 27-1-24.
- For survey article on criminal law and procedure for the period from June 1, 2002 through May 31, 2003, see 55 Mercer L. Rev. 117 (2003).
- O.C.G.A. § 52-7-25, allowing suspicionless stops of boats to check for required safety equipment and vehicle registration, promotes the state's important interest in maintaining safe conditions for boaters on Georgia's lakes and rivers, and the procedure used is minimally intrusive, so that the statute does not violate U.S. Const., amend. IV. Peruzzi v. State, 275 Ga. 333, 567 S.E.2d 15 (2002).
- Provisions of O.C.G.A. § 52-7-25 clearly authorize officers to make investigatory stops of watercraft for the sole purpose of verifying that the operator has the proper documentation and safety equipment on board; the officer need not suspect wrongdoing before such a stop is permitted. Jackson v. State, 214 Ga. App. 726, 448 S.E.2d 761 (1994).
Department of Natural Resources officer who observed the defendant's boat operating with its docking lights improperly illuminated, O.C.G.A. § 52-7- 11(b)(2), had the authority to detain the defendant and make a brief safety inspection under O.C.G.A. § 52-7-25(b)(4); the defendant was not in custody during the stop and Miranda warnings were not required. Pedersen v. State, 337 Ga. App. 159, 786 S.E.2d 535 (2016), cert. denied, No. S16C1641, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 828 (Ga. 2016).
Cited in Dalton v. State, 216 Ga. App. 411, 454 S.E.2d 554 (1995).
- 12 Am. Jur. 2d, Boats and Boating, §§ 7, 10, 14, 17.
- Laches: waiver or estoppel on part of government respecting obstruction to navigation, 2 A.L.R. 1694.
Criminal liability for injury or death caused by operation of pleasure boat, 8 A.L.R.4th 886.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-07-15
Citation: 275 Ga. 333, 567 S.E.2d 15, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 2101, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 586
Snippet: He challenged the constitutionality of OCGA § 52-7-25, which authorizes rangers employed by the Georgia