O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 53-13-1 (2019)
Short title
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Revised Uniform Fiduciary Access to Digital Assets Act.’’
History
Code 1981, § 53-13-1, enacted by Ga. L. 2018, p. 1089, § 1/SB 301.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2
cases, 1982–1987 · leading case: Smith v. Hawks, 355 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987).
Smith v. Hawks, 355 S.E.2d 669 (Ga. Ct. App. 1987). “See OCGA § 53-13-1. However, the Bank and Trust's ostensible acceptance of a trusteeship in 1979 cannot give rise to a valid trust if, as a matter of law, no such valid trust was then capable of being created by the Corporation.”
Merritt v. Citizens Trust Bank, 298 S.E.2d 264 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982). “We do not have copies of the deeds in the record; however, Citizens Trust recites in the 1971 complaint that the instruments conveyed interest in trust to the bank.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.