O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1013 (2019)

Prohibition of certain acts

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It shall be prohibited for any person transacting a mortgage business in or from this state, including any person required to be licensed under this article and any person exempted from the licensing requirements of this article under Code Section 7-1-1001, to: (1) Misrepresent the material facts, make false statements or promises, or submit false statements or documents likely to influ568

ence, persuade, or induce an applicant for a mortgage loan, a mortgagee, or a mortgagor to take a mortgage loan, or, through agents or otherwise, pursue a course of misrepresentation by use of fraudulent or unauthorized documents or other means to the department or anyone; (2) Misrepresent or conceal or cause another to misrepresent or conceal material factors, terms, or conditions of a transaction to which a mortgage lender or broker is a party, pertinent to an applicant or application for a mortgage loan or a mortgagor; (3) Fail to disburse funds in accordance with a written commitment or agreement to make a mortgage loan; (4) Improperly refuse to issue a satisfaction of a mortgage loan; (5) Fail to account for or deliver to any person any personal property obtained in connection with a mortgage loan such as money, funds, deposit, check, draft, mortgage, or other document or thing of value which has come into the possession of a licensee and which is not the property of the licensee, or which the mortgage lender or broker is not in law or at equity entitled to retain; (6) Engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which is not in good faith or fair dealing, or which operates a fraud upon any person, in connection with the attempted or actual making of, purchase of, transfer of, or sale of any mortgage loan; (7) Engage in any fraudulent home mortgage underwriting practices; (8) Induce, require, or otherwise permit the applicant for a mortgage loan or mortgagor to sign a security deed, note, loan application, or other pertinent financial disclosure documents with any blank spaces to be filled in after it has been signed, except blank spaces relating to recording or other incidental information not available at the time of signing; (9) Make, directly or indirectly, any residential mortgage loan with the intent to foreclose on the borrower’s property. For purposes of this paragraph, there shall be a presumption that a person has made a residential mortgage loan with the intent to foreclose on the borrower’s property if the following circumstances can be demonstrated: (A) Lack of substantial benefit to the borrower; (B) Lack of probability of full payment of the loan by the borrower; and (C) A significant proportion of similarly foreclosed loans by such person;

(10) Provide an extension of credit or collect a mortgage debt by extortionate means; or (11) Purposely withhold, delete, destroy, or alter information requested by an examiner of the department or make false statements or material misrepresentations to the department or the Nationwide Multistate Licensing System and Registry or in connection with any investigation conducted by the department or another governmental agency.

History

Code 1981, § 7-1-1013, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 543, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 848, § 20; Ga. L. 1999, p. 674, § 38; Ga. L. 2000, p. 174, § 32; Ga. L. 2005, p. 826, § 35/SB 82; Ga. L. 2009, p. 252, § 1/HB 312; Ga. L. 2016, p. 390, § 6-1/HB 811; Ga. L. 2020, p. 493, § 7/SB 429; Ga. L. 2024, p. 354, § 1-30/HB 876, effective July 1, 2024. Amendments. The 2024 amendment, effective July 1, 2024, in the middle of the introductory

language, deleted “or registered” following “licensed” and deleted “or registration” following “licensing”; and deleted “or registrant” following “licensee” twice in paragraph (5).

Annotations

Code Commission notes. Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1993, “paragraph” was substituted for “subsection” in the second sentence of paragraph (9).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Section does not apply to foreclosure proceedings. - Plain language of O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1013 limits the statute’s applicability to the actions taken to make, purchase, transfer, or sell mortgage loans. The Georgia Residential Mortgage Act, O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1000 et seq., is not applicable in foreclosure proceedings. Roylston v. Bank of Am., N.A., 290 Ga. App. 556, 660 S.E.2d 412, 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 371 (2008). Acts not covered by bond. - Trial court erred in granting a purchaser summary judgment and in denying an insurer summary judgment in the purchaser’s action to recover against a bond the insurer issued to a mortgage lender under the Georgia Residential Mortgage Act, O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1000 et seq., because the acts that gave rise to the judgment the purchaser obtained against the lender occurred before the bond was in effect, and the lender’s failure to pay the judgment was not an act that authorized recovery against the bond; the bond did

not contain a specific covenant extending liability to acts prior to the bond’s execution. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. iFreedom Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. iFreedom Direct Corp., 312 Ga. App. 262, 718 S.E.2d 103, 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 934 (2011), cert. denied, No. S12C0408, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 246 (Ga. Feb. 27, 2012). Act foreclosed borrower’s claim under the Fair Business Practices Act. - Homeowner’s Fair Business Practices Act (FBPA), O.C.G.A. § 10-1-390 et seq., claim against the homeowner’s mortgage lender arising out of foreclosure of the homeowner’s home failed because the Georgia Residential Mortgage Act, O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1000 et seq., specifically regulates misrepresentation by use of fraudulent or unauthorized documents or other means relating to mortgages; thus, O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1013(1) precluded a claim under the FBPA, pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 10-1-396. Stewart v. SunTrust Mortg., Inc., 331 Ga. App. 635, 770 S.E.2d 892, 2015 Ga. App. LEXIS 216 (2015).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1997–2021 · leading case: Roylston v. Bank of Am., N.A., 660 S.E.2d 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008).
Roylston v. Bank of Am., N.A., 660 S.E.2d 412 (Ga. Ct. App. 2008). · cites it 8× “(a) Roylston first claims that Bank of America violated OCGA § 7-1-1013 (6) of the GRMA when it failed to provide him with mailed notice of its foreclosure proceedings.”
Stewart v. Suntrust Mortg., Inc., 770 S.E.2d 892 (Ga. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 7-1-1013 (1). Because the mortgage industry is regulated and because the specific conduct at issue here is regulated by the GRMA, Stewart’s FBPA claim fails.”
Geary v. Wilshire Credit Corp., 673 S.E.2d 15 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 6× “Instead, on May 21, 2007, Geary filed a pro se action in seven counts in the State Court of Gwinnett County against these same defendants, alleging that the law firm violated 15 USC § 1692g of the FDCPA and committed related acts of fraud and negligence, including wrongful…”
Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. iFreedom Direct Corp., 718 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “The Act, in OCGA § 7-1-1013, specifically prohibits various acts by mortgage business professionals, such as misrepresenting material facts in connection with a mortgage loan, failing to disburse funds in accordance with a mortgage loan agreement and improperly refusing to issue…”
McWhorter v. Ford Consum. Fin. Co., Inc., 33 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (N.D. Ga. 1997). · cites it 2× “broker is a party, pertinent to an applicant for a mortgage loan” and therefore has a duty to disclose such information. In the instant ease, for substantially the same reasons that the court granted Defendant Ford’s motion for summary judgment on a virtually identical fraud…”
Taylor v. Jacques (In Re Taylor), 292 B.R. 434 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2002). “Defendant argues that the conduct alleged in plaintiffs complaint is further regulated by the Georgia Residential Mortgage Act, and in particular § 7-1-1013 which prohibits any person transacting a mortgage business from misrepresenting the material facts or making false…”
Kareem v. Phh Mortg. Corp. (D.N.J. 2021). · cites it 4× “We are construing this claim as alleging a violation of O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1013 because courts have only found a private right of action under O.”
— 7-1-1013(2) — 1 case
McWhorter v. Ford Consum. Fin. Co., Inc., 33 F. Supp. 2d 1059 (N.D. Ga. 1997). “broker is a party, pertinent to an applicant for a mortgage loan” and therefore has a duty to disclose such information. In the instant ease, for substantially the same reasons that the court granted Defendant Ford’s motion for summary judgment on a virtually identical fraud…”
— 7-1-1013(6) — 1 case
Kareem v. Phh Mortg. Corp. (D.N.J. 2021). “We are construing this claim as alleging a violation of O.C.G.A. § 7-1-1013 because courts have only found a private right of action under O.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.