Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this article, the term:
It does not include accounts established for deposit of funds of a partnership, joint venture, or other association for business purposes; accounts controlled by one or more persons as the duly authorized agent or trustee for a corporation, unincorporated association, or charitable or civic organization; or a regular fiduciary or trust account where the relationship is established other than by deposit agreement.
(Code 1933, § 41A-3801, enacted by Ga. L. 1976, p. 1388, § 8; Ga. L. 2011, p. 518, § 5/HB 239.)
- For annual survey of wills, trusts, and administration, see 43 Mercer L. Rev. 457 (1991). For annual survey article on wills, trusts and administration of estates, see 50 Mercer L. Rev. 381 (1998). For survey article discussing developments in law of business associations for the period from June 1, 1998 through May 31, 1999, see 51 Mercer L. Rev. 127 (1999). For article, "Business Associations," see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 109 (2001). For article, "Wills, Trusts & Administration of Estates," see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 499 (2001).
- Once the payee produced the sister's and husband's death certificates and had them removed as joint tenants on the CD accounts, the accounts ceased to be multiple-party accounts subject to the strictures of O.C.G.A. § 7-1-814. Lowe v. Barnett Bank, 209 Ga. App. 112, 433 S.E.2d 294 (1993).
- In a dispute over a joint account created by a father, mother, and daughter, although only the father made contributions to the account, the daughter's contributions could include deposits made by the father for the daughter; because some evidence indicated an intent that the money would belong to the daughter, the trial court erred by concluding that all of the funds belonged to the mother after the father's death. Howard v. Leonard, 330 Ga. App. 331, 765 S.E.2d 466 (2014).
- Corporation was not an eligible "payable on death" (POD) beneficiary on certificates of deposit or a trust account because under O.C.G.A. § 7-1-810(11), a POD payee on a death account had to have been a person, and under § 7-1-810(2), a beneficiary on a trust account had to have been a person; under O.C.G.A. § 7-1-4(26), a "person" was defined as an individual, trust, general or limited partnership, unincorporated association (except a joint-stock association), or any other form of unincorporated enterprise. Thus, the corporation did not meet the statutory definition of person. Tuvim v. United Jewish Cmtys., Inc., 285 Ga. 632, 680 S.E.2d 827 (2009).
Cited in Lastinger v. Johnson, 148 Ga. App. 453, 251 S.E.2d 369 (1978); White v. Royal, 150 Ga. App. 57, 256 S.E.2d 662 (1979); Johnson v. Lastinger, 152 Ga. App. 328, 262 S.E.2d 601 (1979); Bank S. v. Harrell, 181 Ga. App. 64, 351 S.E.2d 263 (1986); Lamb v. Thalimer Enters., Inc., 193 Ga. App. 70, 386 S.E.2d 912 (1989); Parker v. Peavey, 198 Ga. App. 694, 403 S.E.2d 213 (1991); South v. Bank of Am., 250 Ga. App. 747, 551 S.E.2d 55 (2001).
- 10 Am. Jur. 2d, Banks and Financial Institutions, §§ 662 et seq., 682 et seq. 22A Am. Jur. 2d, Death, §§ 366, 426, 427. 60 Am. Jur. 2d, Payment, § 1.
- 9 C.J.S., Banks and Banking, §§ 294, et seq., 300 et seq. 32A C.J.S., Evidence, § 1028. 70 C.J.S., Payment, § 1 et seq.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-06-15
Citation: 680 S.E.2d 827, 285 Ga. 632, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 2018, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 308
Snippet: or more persons.” (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 7-1-810 (11). Similarly, a beneficiary on a trust account
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-10-06
Citation: 490 S.E.2d 384, 268 Ga. 444, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 3696, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 619
Snippet: accounts. See Ga. L.1976, p. 1388, § 8; OCGA §§ 7-1-810 to OCGA 7-1-821; Rehberg, Wills, Trusts, and Administration