Syfert Injury Law Firm
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448The purpose of this chapter is to authorize and provide regulation of the business of making loans of $3,000.00 or less and to bring within the regulation of this chapter and within its provisions all loans of $3,000.00 or less, whether or not made by a person organized or operating under the provisions and authority of some other statute, except those persons and loans expressly exempted by the terms of this chapter. Even though authorized by other statutes of force, such loans and the persons making them, unless expressly exempted, shall be within the operation of this chapter in accordance with its terms.
(Ga. L. 1955, p. 431, § 2; Ga. L. 1975, p. 393, § 1.)
- After the defendants entered into separate funding agreements with the plaintiffs, the defendant's motion to dismiss a putative class action for damages premised on violations of the Georgia Industrial Loan Act (GILA), O.C.G.A. § 7-3-1 et seq., was properly granted, but the defendant's motion with regard to the Payday Lending Act (PLA), O.C.G.A. § 16-17-1 et seq., was improperly denied as the funding agreements were not loans, but rather were investments in the plaintiffs' litigation, because the repayment requirement was completely contingent upon the recovery of proceeds from the plaintiffs' related legal claims; thus, instead of being loans that were regulated by the GILA and the PLA, the funding agreements were investment contracts to which the GILA and the PLA did not apply. Cherokee Funding LLC v. Ruth, 342 Ga. App. 404, 802 S.E.2d 865 (2017).
Cited in Colter v. Consolidated Credit Corp., 115 Ga. App. 408, 154 S.E.2d 713 (1967); Bragg v. HFC, 140 Ga. App. 75, 230 S.E.2d 55 (1976); Marshall v. Fulton Nat'l Bank, 145 Ga. App. 190, 243 S.E.2d 266 (1978); General Fin. Corp. v. Sprouse, 577 F.2d 989 (5th Cir. 1978); Gainesville Fin. Servs., Inc. v. McDougal, 154 Ga. App. 820, 270 S.E.2d 40 (1980); FinanceAmerica Corp. v. Drake, 154 Ga. App. 811, 270 S.E.2d 449 (1980).
- Purpose of the Georgia Industrial Loan Act (see O.C.G.A. § 7-3-1 et seq.) is to provide regulation for otherwise unregulated entities engaged in business of making small loans. Banks are otherwise regulated and are, therefore, not subject to regulation under that Act. 1979 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 79-33.
- 53A Am. Jur. 2d, Moneylenders and Pawnbrokers, § 1 et seq.
- 47 C.J.S., Interest and Usury; Consumer Credit, §§ 407, 408.
- Construction and application of provisions of small loan acts as regards maximum amount of loan, 99 A.L.R. 923.
Construction and application of provisions of small loan statutes prohibiting the splitting up or dividing of a loan, or the existence of indebtedness under more than one contract of loan at the same time, 141 A.L.R. 912.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-06-24
Citation: 830 S.E.2d 119, 306 Ga. 252
Snippet: one of its attorneys for violations of OCGA § 31-7-3.2 (j), deceptive trade practices, and false advertising
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-15
Snippet: vegetation grows alongside state waters. See OCGA § 12-7-3 (2) (defining “buffer” as “the area of land immediately
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-15
Citation: 297 Ga. 306, 773 S.E.2d 706
Snippet: vegetation grows alongside state waters. See OCGA § 12-7-3 (2) (defining “buffer” as “the area of land immediately
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-06-02
Citation: 663 S.E.2d 141, 283 Ga. 587, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 1835, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 434
Snippet: violations of Rules 1.15 (I-III), 1.2(a), 1.3; 1.5, 1.7, 3.2, 8.4(a)(4), and 9.3 of Bar Rule 4-102(d) of the