Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448As used in this chapter, the term:
The term does not include any parking area which is not open or regularly used for parking by users of the remote service terminal who are conducting remote service terminal transactions during the hours of darkness. A parking area is not open if it is physically closed to access or if conspicuous signs indicate that it is closed. If a multiple-level parking area satisfies the conditions of this paragraph and would therefore otherwise be a defined parking area, only the single parking level deemed by the operator of the remote service terminal to be the most directly accessible to the users of the remote service terminal shall be a defined parking area.
(Code 1981, §7-8-1, enacted by Ga. L. 1993, p. 917, § 12; Ga. L. 1994, p. 97, § 7.)
Total Results: 10
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-12-20
Snippet: 20 (1985); Williams v. State, 252 Ga. 7, 8 (1) (310 SE2d 528) (1984)). Below, the habeas
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-06-20
Citation: 299 Ga. 238, 787 S.E.2d 721, 2016 WL 3390440, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 424
Snippet: stated in Williams v. State, 252 Ga. 7, 8 (1) (310 SE2d 528) (1984): [T]o allow a jury
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-11-25
Citation: 294 Ga. 270, 751 S.E.2d 821, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 3675, 2013 WL 6173760, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 1002
Snippet: substantially similar. Pope v. Fields, 273 Ga. 6, 7-8 (1) (536 SE2d 740) (2000). In fact, the requirement
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-22
Citation: 692 S.E.2d 595, 286 Ga. 760, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 860, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 268
Snippet: "sidewalk" is used in other contexts. See, e.g., OCGA §§ 7-8-1(1) (relating to bank remote access terminals), and
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2008-10-27
Citation: 668 S.E.2d 685, 284 Ga. 504, 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 3374, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 845
Snippet: substantially similar. [Cits.] Pope v. Fields, 273 Ga. 6, 7-8(1)(a), 536 S.E.2d 740 (2000). Martin concedes that
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-12-01
Citation: 591 S.E.2d 774, 277 Ga. 460, 691 S.E.2d 774, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 3650, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 1049
Snippet: discretion.’ [Cit.]” Henderson v. McVay, 269 Ga. 7-8 (1) (494 SE2d 653) (1998). OCGA § 9-11-58 (a), Uniform
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-03-01
Citation: 512 S.E.2d 896, 270 Ga. 688, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 863, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 173
Snippet: See Lawrence v. State of Georgia, 201 Ga.App. 7, 7-8(1), 410 S.E.2d 136 (1991); Blackburn v. State, 180
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-12-04
Citation: 464 S.E.2d 207, 266 Ga. 109
Snippet: at 1025-1026. Id. at 1029-1030. OCGA §§ 7-8-1 to 7-8-8. See Lau’s Corp., 261 Ga. at 493-494;
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-09-11
Citation: 461 S.E.2d 222, 265 Ga. 653
Snippet: 440 S.E.2d 15 (1994); Williams v. State, 252 Ga. 7, 8(1), 310 S.E.2d 528 (1984). Judgment affirmed. All
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1855-02-15
Citation: 17 Ga. 439
Snippet: Ib. 230; 1 Hale’s P. C. 361; 2 Ib. 179; Fost. 7, 8; 1 Chitty’s Crim. Law, 223; McNally’s Ev. 496-7, et