Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448In an action in which any part of the relief sought is a judgment for a sum of money or the disposition of any other thing capable of delivery, a party, upon notice to every other party, and by leave of court, may deposit with the court all or any part of such sum or thing to be held by the clerk of the court, subject to withdrawal, in whole or in part, at any time thereafter upon order of the court, upon posting of sufficient security. Where the thing deposited is money, interest thereupon shall abate.
(Ga. L. 1966, p. 609, § 67.)
- Recovery of interest upon damages for breach of contract, § 13-6-13.
- For provisions of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 67, and annotations pertaining thereto, see 28 U.S.C.
- For annual survey of trial practice and procedure, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 433 (2004).
- In a contract action, a party was not entitled to prejudgment and postjudgment interest when deposits were made pursuant to the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67. Sacha v. Coffee Butler Serv., Inc., 215 Ga. App. 280, 450 S.E.2d 704 (1994).
Trial court's order granting the motion for supercedeas bond was reversed to the extent that the order abated post-judgment interest because abatement of the post-judgment interest was prohibited by the supersedeas, and the trial court erred in so ordering. Northside Bank v. Mountainbrook of Bartow County Homeowners Ass'n, 338 Ga. App. 126, 789 S.E.2d 378 (2016).
- Check deposited in the clerk's office without leave of court, which was made out to the plaintiffs with an endorsement that "the undersign [sic] payees accept the amount of this payment in full satisfaction of all claims against drawer to property located at [the premises in issue]," failed to comply with the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67 because it attempted to impose conditions on its acceptance, thereby rendering the money unavailable to the plaintiffs for withdrawal. Thus, the deposit did not relieve the defendant from all liability for postjudgment interest on the sums deposited in the court, and the trial court did not err by entering judgment therefor. Gunnin v. Parker, 198 Ga. App. 864, 403 S.E.2d 822, cert. denied, 198 Ga. App. 897, 403 S.E.2d 822 (1991).
- Since the county in a condemnation proceeding did not deposit funds into the registry as required by a consent decree, the requirements of the statute were not complied with; therefore, the trial court did not have authority to abate prejudgment interest by making the court's order retroactive to the date of the consent decree. Threatt v. Forsyth County, 250 Ga. App. 838, 552 S.E.2d 123 (2001).
- When, in a divorce proceeding, the husband's attorney violated O.C.G.A. § 9-11-67 and pertinent court rules, the court properly awarded attorney's fees paid to the wife personally by the husband's attorney either on the basis that the actions of the latter constituted contempt, or as a sua sponte award of attorney's fees. Cohen v. Feldman, 219 Ga. App. 90, 464 S.E.2d 237 (1995), overruled on other grounds by Williams v. Cooper, 280 Ga. 145, 625 S.E.2d 754 (2006).
Cited in Hudson v. Omaha Indem. Co., 183 Ga. App. 847, 360 S.E.2d 406 (1987); Cheeks v. Novatel Carcom, Inc., 200 Ga. App. 664, 409 S.E.2d 229 (1991); Great S. Midway, Inc. v. Hughes, 223 Ga. App. 643, 478 S.E.2d 400 (1996); Threatt v. Forsyth County, 262 Ga. App. 186, 585 S.E.2d 159 (2003); Schoenbaum Ltd. Co., LLC v. Lenox Pines, LLC, 262 Ga. App. 457, 585 S.E.2d 643 (2003); Sanders v. Riley, 296 Ga. 693, 770 S.E.2d 570 (2015).
- 23 Am. Jur. 2d, Deposits in Court, § 1 et seq.
8B Am. Jur. Pleading and Practice Forms, Deposits In Court, § 1 et seq.
- 26B C.J.S., Deposits in Court, § 1 et seq. 35B C.J.S., Federal Civil Procedure, § 1153.
- Who bears loss of funds held by third person, or deposited in court, awaiting outcome of litigation, 2 A.L.R. 463.
Liability of clerk of court or his bond for money paid into his hands by virtue of his office, 59 A.L.R. 60.
Total Results: 7
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-03-15
Snippet: the attorney fees amount, we note that OCGA § 9-11-67 provides a way for a party to abate the accrual
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-03-11
Citation: 826 S.E.2d 71, 305 Ga. 489
Snippet: claim at issue here, which arose in 2008, OCGA § 9-11-67.1, adopted in 2013, provides that "[p]rior to the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-03-06
Citation: 300 Ga. 848, 797 S.E.2d 814, 2017 WL 875034, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 172
Snippet: dissenting. Because the plain language of OCGA § 9-11-67.1 (g) prohibits a claimant from conditioning acceptance
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Snippet: months later, AGAC did the same. See OCGA §§ 9-11-67, 23-3-90. On November 14, 2011, Curtis filed
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-16
Citation: 296 Ga. 693, 770 S.E.2d 570, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 178
Snippet: two months later, AGAC did the same. See OCGA §§ 9-11-67, 23-3-90. *697 On November 14, 2011
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-03-04
Citation: 292 Ga. 497, 739 S.E.2d 306, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 395, 2013 WL 776508, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 195
Snippet: judgment,” and permitted the Board, under OCGA § 9-11-67,2 to deposit funds into the registry of the superior
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-11-05
Citation: 554 S.E.2d 492, 274 Ga. 547, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 3324, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 860
Snippet: Kinchlo, 150 Ga. 296, 103 S.E. 713 (1920); OCGA § 9-11-67 (contemplating a party's deposit with the trial