O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 9-13-169 (2019)

Note or memorandum unnecessary

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

No note or memorandum in writing shall be necessary to charge any person at a judicial sale. (Laws 1831, Cobb’s 1851 Digest, p. 514; Code 1863, § 2577; Code 1868, § 2579; Code 1873, § 2621; Code 1882, § 2621; Civil Code 1895, § 5448; Civil Code 1910, § 6053; Code 1933, § 39-1306.)

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS This section applies to administrator’s sale made under order of court. Green v. Freeman, 126 Ga. 274, 55 S.E. 45 (1906). Section does not apply to a sale by administrator under power conferred by deed. Davis v. Davis, 28 Ga. App. 306, 110 S.E. 919 (1922).

This section does not apply to sale under power conferred by mortgage. Seymour v. National Bldg. & Loan Ass’n, 116 Ga. 285, 42 S.E. 518 (1902). Cited in James v. Safari Enters., Inc., 244 Ga. App. 813, 537 S.E.2d 103 (2000).

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 50A C.J.S., Judicial Sales, § 59 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2000–2000 · leading case: James v. Safari Enter., Inc., 537 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000).
James v. Safari Enter., Inc., 537 S.E.2d 103 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 9-13-169. 2 Moreover, we note that once Safari Enterprises learned that James would not be honoring her bid, it had the option of reselling the property and thus it was not left without a remedy.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.