✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Redmon v. Johnson, 809 S.E.2d 468 (Ga. 2018). · cites it 2דThe statutory requirements that habeas hearings must be transcribed, see OCGA § 9-14-50, that the habeas court’s order must include written findings of fact and conclusions of law as part of the record, see OCGA § 9-14-49, and that the record (including the transcript, if…”
Edwards v. State, 707 S.E.2d 335 (Ga. 2011). · cites it 4דIn February 2009, we granted a certificate of probable cause to appeal and by order remanded the case with direction that the habeas court “hold a hearing that is transcribed, see OCGA § 9-14-50 [and] address all the grounds raised in the petition,” which had been incorrectly…”
Redmon v. Johnson, 302 Ga. 763 (2018). · cites it 2דUntil recently, every habeas case was discussed at a banc 1 The statutory requirements that habeas hearings must be transcribed, see OCGA § 9-14-50, that the habeas court’s order must include written findings of fact and conclusions of law as part of the record, see OCGA §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.