O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A. § 9-14-50 (2019)
Transcription of proceedings
✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official)
JustiaJustia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
All trials held under this article shall be transcribed by a court reporter designated by the superior court hearing the case.
History
(Code 1933, § 50-127, enacted by Ga. L. 1967, p. 835, § 3.)
Annotations
JUDICIAL DECISIONS Cited in Hilliard v. Hilliard, 243 Ga. 424, 254 S.E.2d 372 (1979). OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL This section would not require a transcript of ‘‘mental illness’’ habeas
corpus proceedings. 1967 Op. Att’y Gen. No. 67-320.
RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. - 39A C.J.S., Habeas Corpus, §§ 354, 355.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2011–2018 · leading case: Redmon v. Johnson, 809 S.E.2d 468 (Ga. 2018).
Redmon v. Johnson, 809 S.E.2d 468 (Ga. 2018). “The statutory requirements that habeas hearings must be transcribed, see OCGA § 9-14-50, that the habeas court’s order must include written findings of fact and conclusions of law as part of the record, see OCGA § 9-14-49, and that the record (including the transcript, if…”
Edwards v. State, 707 S.E.2d 335 (Ga. 2011). “In February 2009, we granted a certificate of probable cause to appeal and by order remanded the case with direction that the habeas court “hold a hearing that is transcribed, see OCGA § 9-14-50 [and] address all the grounds raised in the petition,” which had been incorrectly…”
Redmon v. Johnson, 302 Ga. 763 (Ga. 2018). “Until recently, every habeas case was discussed at a banc 1 The statutory requirements that habeas hearings must be transcribed, see OCGA § 9-14-50, that the habeas court’s order must include written findings of fact and conclusions of law as part of the record, see OCGA §…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.