Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Such periods of limitation shall cease to run on the twenty-second day following the day such request was received and shall resume on the day following the date such medical records, or response stating that the provider does not have custody or control of the medical records, are actually received by such injured person or his attorney; provided, however, that such periods of limitation shall be tolled only once for any cause of action.
(Code 1981, §9-3-97.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1989, p. 419, § 2; Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 4.)
- Ga. L. 2000, p. 1589, § 16, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that the amendment to this Code section is applicable with respect to notices delivered on or after July 1, 2000.
O.C.G.A. § 9-3-97.1 does not prescribe exact language for identifying the records sought, and using slightly different language in the request and the authorization to release records does not change the request itself. Ajayi v. Williams, 248 Ga. App. 325, 546 S.E.2d 537 (2001), overruled on other grounds by VATACS Group, Inc. et al. v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 281 Ga. 50, 635 S.E.2d 758 (2006).
- There was no violation of O.C.G.A. § 9-3-97.1 because the plaintiff failed to request that the plaintiff's medical records be mailed by certified or registered mail or statutory overnight delivery, "return receipt requested," since such requirement is for the protection of the patient making the request rather than the provider, and it was undisputed that the records were never sent. Ajayi v. Williams, 248 Ga. App. 325, 546 S.E.2d 537 (2001), overruled on other grounds by VATACS Group, Inc. et al. v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 281 Ga. 50, 635 S.E.2d 758 (2006).
- There was no violation of O.C.G.A. § 9-3-97.1 because the plaintiff requested certified copies of the plaintiff's medical records, notwithstanding that such request is not authorized by the statute; however, because compliance with this request was not mandated by the statute, but was merely an additional request of terms with which the defendant was not required to comply. Ajayi v. Williams, 248 Ga. App. 325, 546 S.E.2d 537 (2001), overruled on other grounds by VATACS Group, Inc. et al. v. Homeside Lending, Inc., 281 Ga. 50, 635 S.E.2d 758 (2006).
No results found for Georgia Code 9-3-97.1.