Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1933, § 7-312, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 2270, § 1; Code 1981, §9-9-91; Code 1981, §9-9-11, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 903, § 1.)
- For article, "Construction Law," see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 173 (2001). For annual survey of construction law, see 56 Mercer L. Rev. 109 (2004).
- Trial court properly vacated the modification of an existing award under O.C.G.A. § 9-9-13 after finding that the arbitration panel had overstepped its authority by modifying the merits of its award, when none of the statutory grounds for modification under subsection (a) of O.C.G.A. § 9-9-11 had been met. Conmac Corp. v. Southern Diversified Dev., Inc., 245 Ga. App. 895, 539 S.E.2d 532 (2000).
- Arbitrator had broad authority to consider any disputes arising out of the contract consistent with the parties' agreement for the sale of the home; the seller specifically submitted to the arbitrator its claim for the damages arising from the change orders as did the purchaser and thus the issue was properly submitted to the arbitrator and no ground existed for modifying the award which found that the seller was not entitled to keep the earnest money because it was in material breach but was entitled to actual damages for the approved changes. Henderson v. Millner Devs., LLC, 259 Ga. App. 709, 578 S.E.2d 289 (2003).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15
Citation: 690 S.E.2d 842, 286 Ga. 701, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 723, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 225
Snippet: McChesney Capital Partners, LLC, 280 Ga.App. 9, 9-11, 633 S.E.2d 382 (2006). For purposes of our decision