Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1933, § 7-306, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 2270, § 1; Code 1981, §9-9-85; Code 1981, §9-9-5, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 903, § 1.)
- Court of Appeals erroneously held that the arbitrator, and not the court, should have decided whether arbitration was barred by res judicata, as: (1) no presumption existed that an arbitrator was in a better position than a court to apply a legal doctrine such as res judicata; (2) the parties did not expressly reserve the issue for arbitration; and (3) there was no presumption under Georgia law that the application of a procedural bar such as res judicata was a matter to be determined exclusively by an arbitrator. Bryan County v. Yates Paving & Grading Co., 281 Ga. 361, 638 S.E.2d 302 (2006).
- Which statute of limitations applies to efforts to compel arbitration of a dispute, 77 A.L.R.4th 1071.
What statute of limitations applies to action to compel arbitration pursuant to § 301 of Labor Management Relations Act (29 USCS § 185), 96 A.L.R. Fed. 378.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-11-30
Citation: 638 S.E.2d 302, 281 Ga. 361, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3702, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 1033
Snippet: the underlying claims on the merits. See OCGA§ 9-9-5 (a) (trial court has discretion *363to determine