Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §9-9-53, enacted by Ga. L. 2012, p. 961, § 1/SB 383.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former O.C.G.A. § 9-9-39 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- There is no requirement that the arbitrator's award include specific findings or reasons absent a request by the parties under subsection (a) of former O.C.G.A. § 9-9-39, or that the award expressly address each and every issue and collateral issue arising in an arbitration. Trend-Pak of Atlanta, Inc. v. Arbor Commercial Div., Inc., 197 Ga. App. 137, 397 S.E.2d 592 (1990) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 9-9-39).
- Trial court properly confirmed an arbitrator's award in a breach of contract action between a wastewater treatment company and a city as: (1) that part of the arbitrator's award which discussed the terms "maintenance" and "capital expenditures" was not inconsistent with the definitions contained in the contract; and (2) the award was based not only on the company's failure to make necessary repairs, but on the deterioration which resulted from that failure. Further, there was no requirement that the arbitrator's award include specific findings or reasons absent a request by the parties under former O.C.G.A. § 9-9-39(a). Operations Mgmt. Int'l v. City of Forsyth, 288 Ga. App. 469, 654 S.E.2d 438 (2007) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 9-9-39).
No results found for Georgia Code 9-9-53.