
Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1933, § 7-308, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 2270, § 1; Code 1981, §9-9-87; Code 1981, §9-9-7, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1988, p. 903, § 1.)
- In light of the similarity of the provisions, decisions under former Code Section 9-9-87 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Superior court correctly dismissed homeowners' motion for the appointment of an arbitrator under O.C.G.A. § 9-9-7 because the homeowners had agreed with their builders to arbitrate any dispute with a specific entity under that entity's rules and procedures. Torres v. Piedmont Builders, Inc., 300 Ga. App. 872, 686 S.E.2d 464 (2009).
Cited in Cotton States Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nunnally Lumber Co., 176 Ga. App. 232, 335 S.E.2d 708 (1985) (decided under former § 9-9-87).
- Validity and effect under state law of arbitration agreement provision for alternative method of appointment of arbitrator where one party fails or refuses to follow appointment procedure specified in agreement, 75 A.L.R.5th 595.
Validity and effect under Federal Arbitration Act (9 USCA § 1 et seq.) of arbitration agreement provision for alternative method of appointment of arbitrator where one party fails or refuses to follow appointment procedure specified in agreement, 159 A.L.R. Fed. 1
Database error: SQLSTATE[HY000]: General error: 8 attempt to write a readonly database
This Georgia Code resource is curated by the attorney maintaining this site, a personal injury and workers' compensation attorney admitted in Georgia (State Bar of Georgia No. 881027, since 2006) and Florida. Attorney Syfert regularly works with Title 9 in the context of Georgia civil practice and statute of limitations and represents clients throughout Northeast Florida and South Georgia. For legal consultation, call 904-383-7448.