§171-55 Permits. (a) Notwithstanding
any other law to the contrary, the board of land and natural resources may
issue permits for the temporary occupancy of state lands or an interest therein
on a month-to-month basis by direct negotiation without public auction, under
conditions and rent which will serve the best interests of the State, subject,
however, to those restrictions as may from time to time be expressly imposed by
the board. A permit on a month-to-month basis may continue for a period not to
exceed one year from the date of its issuance; provided that the board may
allow the permit to continue on a month-to-month basis for additional one year
periods.
(b) In each emergency permit for the
installation of a sandbag, the board shall include as a condition a requirement
for the attachment of identifying information, including the permittee's
contact information and the permit number, to the sandbag. The board shall
specify the form and manner in which the identifying information shall be
attached to the sandbag. [L 1962, c 32, pt of §2; Supp, §103A-52; am L 1967, c
234, §11; HRS §171-55; am L 1990, c 90, §1; am L 2022, c 209, §1]
Law Journals and Reviews
A Voice for the Waters of East Maui. 43 UH L. Rev. 166
(2020).
Notes of Decisions
Carmichael v. Bd. of Land & Nat. Resources. (Haw. 2022).
· cites it 121× “” 9 HRS § 171-55 (2011) provides: Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the board of land and natural resources may issue permits for the temporary occupancy of state lands or an interest therein on a month-to-month basis by direct negotiation without public auction,…”
Kia'i Wai o Wai'ale'ale v. Bd. of Land & Nat. Resources (Haw. 2025).
· cites it 32× “The ICA concluded that Petitioners had standing under article XI, section 9 of the Hawai‘i Constitution (clean and healthful environment), as defined by HRS § 171-55 (2011) and HRS chapter 343 (2010), but that Petitioners’ appeal was nonetheless moot and no exceptions to the…”
Ralston v. Bd. of Land & Nat. Resources (Haw. 2026).
· cites it 26× “Moreover, the majority reasoned, “it would not have been unduly burdensome to afford Ralston a contested case hearing” because BLNR was already required to consider whether RP 7915 would serve the best interests of the State as required under HRS § 171-55. The ICA also stated,…”
Ralston v. Bd. of Land & Nat. Resources (Haw. App. 2025).
· cites it 14× “" As to his interest based on article XI, section 9, Ralston further argues that HRS Chapter 171, including HRS § 171-55,3/ and HRS Chapter 205A are the laws relating to 3/ HRS § 171-55 (2011) provided: (a) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the board of land and…”
Kia'i Wai O Wai'Ale'Ale v. Bd. of Land & Nat. Resources, 550 P.3d 1265 (Haw. App. 2024).
· cites it 6× “It held that BLNR violated Kia#i Wai's and Friends' due process rights when it denied their contested case petitions. It vacated BLNR's continuations of the Permit for 2021 and 2022.”
In re: Off. of Info. Practices Opinion Letter No. F19-04., 501 P.3d 304 (Haw. App. 2021).
· cites it 2× “Accordingly, former HRS § 171-17(f) (1985) required that 13 FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER appraisals used by HDOT to negotiate airport lease rent amounts under HRS § 171-17, or to negotiate airport revocable permit rents under former HRS § 171-55…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.