§444-9 Licenses required. No person
within the purview of this chapter shall act, or assume to act, or advertise,
as general engineering contractor, general building contractor, or specialty
contractor without a license previously obtained under and in compliance with
this chapter and the rules and regulations of the contractors license board. [L
1957, c 305, §1(s 8); Supp, §166A-8; HRS §444-9]
Case Notes
Pursuant to this section, a general engineering or building
contractor is prohibited from doing any work that would require it to act as a
specialty contractor in an area the general contractor was not licensed to
operate; where project required plumbing work classified as C-37 specialty
work, general contractor, which did not hold a C-37 specialty license, could
not do work in that area; court thus erred in holding that project did not
require work in the C-37 classification and that general contractor did not
have to engage a specialty contractor holding a C-37 specialty license. 97 H.
450, 40 P.3d 73 (2002).
Notes of Decisions
Okada Trucking Co. v. Bd. of Water Supply, 53 P.3d 799 (Haw. 2002).
· cites it 4× “On January 28, 2002, we vacated the ICA’s opinion and held, in relevant part, that, pursuant to HRS § 444-9 (1993), 6 “a general engineering or building contractor is prohibited from undertaking any work, solely or as part of a larger project, that would require it to act as a…”
Jones v. Phillipson, 987 P.2d 1015 (Haw. App. 1999).
· cites it 3× “Preliminarily, we observe that the definition of “contractor” in HRS § 444-9 provides that one may not “act, or assume to act, or advertise, as [a contractor] without a license previously obtained under and in compliance with this chapter[.”
Anamizu v. City of Honolulu, 481 P.2d 116 (Haw. 1971).
· cites it 2× “1 HRS § 444-9. 2 HRS § 444-4 states In relevant part that the contractors license board shall: (2) Make, amend, or repeal such rules and regulations as it may deem proper fully to effectuate this chapter and carry out the purpose thereof which purpose is the protection of the…”
Dist. Council 50, of the Int'l Union of Painters & Allied Trades v. Saito, 216 P.3d 108 (Haw. App. 2009).
· cites it 2× “Rather, Chapter 444 vests in the CLB the authority to “[ejnforce this chapter and rules adopted pursuant thereto” and to “[sjuspend or revoke any license for any cause prescribed by this chapter, or for any violation of the rules, and [to] refuse to grant, renew, restore, or…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.