Haw. Rev. Stat. § 661-10

  Actions by State

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

     §661-10  Actions by State.  Whenever it is necessary or desirable for the State in order to collect or recover any money or penalty, or to recover or obtain the possession of any specific property, real or personal, or to enforce any other right (except in respect to criminal prosecutions) to institute judicial proceedings, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, the attorney general may bring and maintain an action or actions for any such purpose in any appropriate court or courts.  All such actions shall be entitled in the name of the State by the attorney general, against the party or parties or thing sued, as defendants. [L 1888, c 51, §1; am imp Org Act, §§2, 81, 86; RL 1925, §2678; RL 1935, §4429; RL 1945, §10484; RL 1955, §245-10; HRS §661-10; am L 1972, c 164, §1(h)]

 

Case Notes

 

  Where complaints asserted that the attorney general brought the actions under §480-2(d) and this section, the state procedural devices were not similar to an action under rule 23 of the federal rules of civil procedure.  761 F.3d 1027 (2014).

  Discussed, regarding the attorney general's authority to bring a non-class action parens patriae suit that sought, among other things, an order enjoining defendants from engaging in unfair or deceptive acts or practices and civil penalties.  907 F. Supp. 2d 1188 (2012).

  Suit by public official must be in the name of the government. 7 H. 314 (1888).

  Suit entitled in name of the Hawaiian government by attorney general could be brought by attorney general through counsel.  8 H. 16 (1890).

  Section is irrelevant and attorney general is without standing as party to rate proceeding before PUC.  54 H. 663, 513 P.2d 1376 (1973).

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1973–2024 · leading case: Hawaii ex rel. Louie v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Hawaii ex rel. Louie v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. (2012) hid · cites it 13× “The Attorney General has the power to bring these claims on behalf of the State under the provisions of Haw.Rev.Stat. § 661-10.” See, e.g., CV 12-00263, Complaint at ¶ 8.”
In Re Hawaiian Telephone Company (1973) haw · cites it 2× “HRS § 28-1 and § 661-10 are not pertinent to the question.”
State of Hawai'i, Ex. Rel. Anne E. Lopez, Attorney General v. CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. (2024) hid “The State seeks the following relief: a declaratory judgment as to each count; an injunction prohibiting Defendants from engaging in further UDAPs; a restitution award, pursuant to Hawai`i Revised Statutes Section 661-10, for all Hawai`i consumers who were affected by…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.