Haw. Rev. Stat. » Haw. Rev. Stat. / Chapter 804
Hawaii Revised Statutes

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 804-61 (2026)

  REPEALED

✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section HI-LEGcapitol.hawaii.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

[PART IV.  MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS]

 

     §804-61  REPEALED.  L 1993, c 181, §4.

 

 

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2016–2017 · leading case: State v. Nelson, 384 P.3d 923 (Haw. App. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Nelson, 384 P.3d 923 (Haw. App. 2016). · cites it 14× “In its motions to set aside the forfeiture judgment, International Fidelity argued that it must be provided relief from the respective bail forfeiture judgment because it was not provided notice under HRS § 804-61, which deprived International Fidelity of the opportunity to…”
State v. Nelson, 398 P.3d 712 (Haw. 2017). · cites it 6× “Specifically, HRS § 804-61 requires that notice be issued to the “surety on the bond,” and the bonds at issue identify only FBB or AAA— and not International Fidelity—where the surety is required to be named pursuant to Criminal Administrative Order No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.