Copy of record — Effect — Charge for furnishing.
(1) It shall be the duty of each reporter to furnish, upon order of the court entered upon written application being made therefor by any attorney of record in a suit, or any party to a suit, in which a stenographic record has been made, a typewritten copy, or copies, of the record, or any part thereof, upon the payment by such attorney, or party, of the cost thereof, as provided in subsection (2) of this section, to such reporter, which payment shall be retained by the reporter as a part of his compensation and in addition to his salary allowed by section 1-1102, Idaho Code. Said copy, or copies, shall, when properly certified by said reporter, constitute prima facie the minutes of the court, and may be used on all motions for new trials, review or appeal, when the minutes of the court may be used; and the cost of which may, when the same is used on review or appeal, be charged as costs in a civil case against the party finally defeated in the action.
(2) That in all actions such reporter shall charge and receive, and retain as provided in subsection (1) of this section, three dollars and twenty-five cents ($3.25) per page for the transcript to be prepared in the style and with the number of copies as directed by rule of the supreme court; provided, however, that when such transcript is requested by a defendant or his attorney on an appeal in a criminal action where after conviction, it appears to the satisfaction of the district court that the accused is poor and unable to procure such transcript, the court must direct payment to such court reporter of the page charge in this subsection provided by the state public defender.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
8
cases (
1 in the last 5 years), 1964–2024 · leading case:
M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
M. L. B. v. S. L. J., 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
“50/page); Idaho Code §1-1105 (2) (1990) ($2/page); Mass.”
State v. Krystal Lynn Easley, 322 P.3d 296 (Idaho 2014).
· cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 1-1105 (2) provides that an indigent criminal defendant *219 on appeal is entitled to procure necessary transcripts at the county’s expense.”
Jackson v. State, 392 P.2d 695 (Idaho 1964).
· cites it 4× “I.C. § 1-1105. Minute entries made by the clerk of the court or by the judge himself, as in this instance, are conclusive of the proceedings so recorded.”
State v. Wallace, 782 P.2d 53 (Idaho Ct. App. 1989).
· cites it 2× “I.C. § 1-1105; State v. Salazar, 95 Idaho 305 , 507 P.”
Mlb v. Slj, 519 U.S. 102 (1996).
“50/page); Idaho Code § 1-1105 (2) (1990) ($2/page); Mass.”
State v. Blazek / State v. Smith (Idaho 2024).
· cites it 27× “, I.C. § 1-1105; I.A.R. 17(h), 24(d). Furthermore, any argument that appeal transcript fees in indigent defense cases are not a necessary indigent defense expense is contrary to the language of the SPD Act and established precedent.”
State v. Salazar, 507 P.2d 1137 (Idaho 1973).
· cites it 2× “” I.C. § 1-1105. Because of the uncertainty whether State’s exhibit 2 was admitted in evidence, we cannot accept this transcript as prima facie evidence of the court proceedings in this case.”
State v. McDermott, 720 P.2d 640 (Idaho 1986).
· cites it 28× “Judge McDermott held that the state was not exempt from payment of the transcript fee permitted under I.C. § 1-1105. Judge McDermott found §§ 67-2301 and 1-1105 to be in conflict and resolved the conflict in favor of § 1-1105.”
— Idaho Code § 1-1105(2) — 1 case
State v. Blazek / State v. Smith (Idaho 2024).
“, I.C. § 1-1105; I.A.R. 17(h), 24(d). Furthermore, any argument that appeal transcript fees in indigent defense cases are not a necessary indigent defense expense is contrary to the language of the SPD Act and established precedent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.