Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 1-2214 (2026)
Objections to assignment — Waiver.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Objections to assignment — Waiver.
All objections to the propriety of an assignment to a magistrate are waived unless made before the trial or hearing begins. No order or judgment is void or subject to collaterial attack merely because rendered pursuant to improper assignment to a magistrate.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1983–2005 · leading case: State v. Smith, 792 P.2d 916 (Idaho 1990).
State v. Smith, 792 P.2d 916 (Idaho 1990). “I.C. § 1-2214. Cf. Parsons v. State, 113 Idaho 421, 424-25 , 745 P.”
Matter of Hanson, 826 P.2d 468 (Idaho 1992). “I.C. § 1-2214 provides that, “All objections to the propriety of an assignment to a magistrate are waived unless made before the trial or hearing begins.”
Carr v. Magistrate Court of First Jud. Dist., 700 P.2d 949 (Idaho 1985). “The Rudd Court also noted that an objection to the assignment of a case to a magistrate is waived under I.C. § 1-2214, “unless made before trial or hearing begins.”
Parsons v. State, 745 P.2d 300 (Idaho Ct. App. 1987). “82(c)(3); I.C. § 1-2214. Finding no timely objection, we hold that the magistrate's decision in this case is neither void nor subject to collateral attack.”
Rudd v. Rudd, 666 P.2d 639 (Idaho 1983). “We would also note that I.C. § 1-2214 indicates that an objection to the assignment of a case to a magistrate is waived unless made before trial or hearing begins.”
Deonier v. State, Pub. Emp. Ret. Bd., 760 P.2d 1137 (Idaho 1988). “2d 270 (1975), this Court and the parties missed a controlling statute, I.C. § 1-2214. Shortly thereafter, this Court recognized the error and promulgated I.”
State v. Jones, 115 P.3d 743 (Idaho 2005). “Further, I.C. § 1-2214 provides that all objections to the propriety of an assignment to a magistrate judge are waived unless made before the trial or hearing begins.”
State v. Crisman, 846 P.2d 928 (Idaho Ct. App. 1992). “No waiver of his challenge to jurisdiction resulted from either I.C. § 1-2214 or I.C.R. 2.2(d). After a hearing on the merits, the magistrate issued a written order denying Crisman’s motion to dismiss.”
McGill v. Lester, 672 P.2d 570 (Idaho Ct. App. 1983). “Idaho Code § 1-2214 specifically provides that “[a]ll objections to the propriety of an assignment to a magistrate are waived unless made before the trial or hearing begins.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.