Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 11-201 (2026)

Property liable to seizure. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Property liable to seizure. 

All goods, chattels, moneys and other property, both real and personal, or any interest therein of the judgment debtor, not exempt by law or by court order, and all property and rights of property, seized and held under attachment in the action, are liable to execution. Shares and interest in any corporation or company, and debts and credits, and all other property both real and personal, or any interest in either real or personal property, and all other property not capable of manual delivery, may be attached on execution in like manner as upon writs of attachment. Gold dust must be returned by the officer as so much money collected, at its current value, without exposing the same to sale. Until a levy, property is not affected by the execution.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 11 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1933–2024 · leading case: Angelos v. Schatzel, 556 P.3d 441 (Idaho 2024).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Angelos v. Schatzel, 556 P.3d 441 (Idaho 2024). · cites it 19× “I.C. § 11-201 (emphasis added). Idaho Code section 11-301 is similarly broad and requires the sheriff to execute the writ against the property of the judgment debtor by levying on a sufficient amount of property if there be sufficient; collecting or selling the things 8 in…”
Williams v. Paxton, 559 P.2d 1123 (Idaho 1977). · cites it 8× “There is, however, a statute, I.C. § 11-201, which provides that a judgment debtor's property is subject to execution and which does not distinguish between the debtor's separate and community property or the separate community character of the debt, which thus suggests that…”
Safaris Unlimited, LLC v. Von Jones, 421 P.3d 205 (Idaho 2018). · cites it 6× “For example, Title 11 permits the judgment creditor to execute on all non-exempt personal and real property of the judgment debtor, I.C. § 11-201, requires any sale proceeds exceeding the amount of the judgment to be returned to the judgment debtor, I.”
Fulton v. Duro, 687 P.2d 1367 (Idaho Ct. App. 1984). · cites it 6× “” I.C. § 11-201. If real estate is levied upon pursuant to the writ, the clerk must record the writ and the return of the writ in the “execution book” alphabetically under the names of the plaintiffs and the defendants in execution.”
Coeur D'Alene Turf Club, Inc. v. Cogswell, 461 P.2d 107 (Idaho 1969). · cites it 2× “, § 11-201; am. 1957, ch. 105, § 1, p. 183.”
Banbury v. Brailsford, 158 P.2d 826 (Idaho 1945). · cites it 2× “, dissenting — By petition for rehearing, respondent urges that appellant, not having appealed from the order denying the change of place of trial as provided by sub-division 2, Section 11-201, I.C.A., may not now question the correctness thereof, relying on Maple v.”
First Trust & Sav. Bank v. Randall, 63 P.2d 157 (Idaho 1936). · cites it 2× “Respondent has moved for a dismissal of the appeal herein, on the ground that the same “is not prosecuted from any judgment or order within the meaning of Section 11-201, I. C. A.” The statute referred to in the motion enumerates the appealable orders and judgments.”
Hunter v. Merger Mines Corp., 160 P.2d 455 (Idaho 1945). · cites it 4× “Respondent’s resistance is bottomed on the propositions that the order was not final because of the reservation therein 1 ; and take issue with appellants as to their construction of Section 11-211, supra, and argue that Section 29-136, supra, provides for a summary hearing…”
Venus Foods v. Dist. Court of Eleventh Jud. Dist., 181 P.2d 775 (Idaho 1947). · cites it 2× “The order of the trial court denying the Venus Foods’ motion to quash the service on its special limited appearance challenging jurisdiction, was not an appeal-able order; Section 11-201, I.C.A., and while the original time within which the Venus Foods was required to answer was…”
Gertztowt v. Humphrey, 27 P.2d 64 (Idaho 1933). · cites it 2× “Kespondent moves to dismiss the appeal as too late under section 11-201, I. C. A., because the decision of the trial court was an order and not a judgment.”
Guiles v. Kellar, 192 P.2d 853 (Idaho 1948). · cites it 2× “Section 11-201(1), I.C.A. Deposit of money in lieu *251 of undertaking under Section 11-202, I.”
— Idaho Code § 11-201(1) — 1 case
Guiles v. Kellar, 192 P.2d 853 (Idaho 1948). “Section 11-201(1), I.C.A. Deposit of money in lieu *251 of undertaking under Section 11-202, I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.