Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 16-2014 (2026)

Appeals. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Appeals. 

Any appeal from an order or decree of the court granting or refusing to grant a termination shall be taken to the supreme court, provided however, pendency of an appeal or application therefor shall not suspend the order of the court relative to termination of the parent-child relationship.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1970–2026 · leading case: State, Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Holt, 625 P.2d 398 (Idaho 1981).
State, Dep't of Health & Welfare v. Holt, 625 P.2d 398 (Idaho 1981). · cites it 4× “The magistrate's order was appealed to the district court pursuant to I.C. § 16-2014 and I.R.C.P. 83. We affirm.”
In Interest of Baby Doe, 936 P.2d 690 (Idaho Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “As grounds for the decree, the magistrate found that the child had been neglected by the father and did not receive the parental care necessary for his health, morals, and well-being due to the lack of parenting skills and unstable life-style of the father.”
State Ex Rel. Child v. Clouse, 477 P.2d 834 (Idaho 1970). · cites it 2× “” By virtue of I.C. § 16-2014, which provides that an appeal may be taken to the district court from an order of the probate court granting a termination of the parent-child relationship, the court had jurisdiction of the case.”
Stenographic Machines, Inc. v. Reg'l Adm'r for Emp. & Training, 577 F.2d 521 (7th Cir. 1978). “…therefor shall not suspend the order of the court relative to termination of the parent-child relationship. Idaho Code § 16-2014 (Supp.1976).”
Jane Doe v. John Doe (2025-33) (Idaho 2026). · cites it 4× “See I.C. § 16-2014 (Supp. 2023) (“Any appeal from an order or decree of the court granting or refusing to grant a termination shall be taken to the supreme court, provided however, pendency of an appeal or application therefor shall not suspend the order of the court relative to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.