Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 18-3127 (2026)

Receiving or possessing fraudulently obtained goods or services. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Receiving or possessing fraudulently obtained goods or services. 

It is unlawful for any person to receive, retain, conceal, possess or dispose of personal property, cash or other representative of value, who knows or has reason to believe the property, cash or other representative of value has been obtained by fraud as set forth in sections 18-3123, 18-3124, 18-3125A and 18-3126, Idaho Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1991–2012 · leading case: State v. Shiloff, 867 P.2d 978 (Idaho 1994).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Shiloff, 867 P.2d 978 (Idaho 1994). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 18-3127. In his reply brief, Shiloff withdrew this issue from consideration, noting that the issue had since been raised on motion to the district court and the district court had corrected the error, reducing the maximum term of confinement on that sentence to a period…”
State v. Gallipeau, 909 P.2d 619 (Idaho Ct. App. 1994). · cites it 2× “I.C. § 18-3127. The district court corrected the sentence to require that Gallipeau serve a minimum of two years followed by an indeterminate term of three years.”
State v. Frances Darleen Rawlin (Idaho Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “________________________________________________ Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; LANSING, Judge; and GUTIERREZ, Judge PER CURIAM Frances Darleen Rawlin was convicted of felony possession of fraudulently obtained goods, Idaho Code §§ 18-3127 ; 18-3128; 18-3126.”
State v. Morris, 817 P.2d 1095 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “Morris argues on appeal that his sentence is unreasonable.”
— Idaho Code § 18-3127(3) — 1 case
State v. Morris, 817 P.2d 1095 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991). “Morris argues on appeal that his sentence is unreasonable.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.