Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 19-1302 (2026)
Filing and endorsement of information.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Filing and endorsement of information.
All informations shall be filed in the court having jurisdiction of the offense specified therein by the prosecuting attorney as informant to which he shall subscribe his name.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15
cases, 1955–2017 · leading case: State v. Olsen, 647 P.2d 734 (Idaho 1982).
State v. Olsen, 647 P.2d 734 (Idaho 1982). “I.C. § 19-1302 requires the prosecuting attorney to endorse on the information the names of all witnesses known to him at the time of filing the information.”
Stockwell v. State, 573 P.2d 116 (Idaho 1977). “I.C. § 19-1302. Four months later, however, the prosecutor approached District Judge Bellwood ex parte, and on the strength of a motion stating only that he "desired" to dismiss and start anew, obtained the judge's signature on orders dismissing all charges against both Rufeners.”
State v. Pierce, 685 P.2d 837 (Idaho Ct. App. 1984). “See also I.C. § 19-1302. Pierce urges that unpleasant surprises during the trial could have been avoided had the state disclosed what it knew about the inmate's prospective testimony.”
State v. Arthur Gene Schmierer, 367 P.3d 163 (Idaho 2016). “” I.C. §§ 19-1302,19-1308 (emphasis added).”
State v. Justin Lee Wilson, 349 P.3d 439 (Idaho Ct. App. 2015). “2d 734 (1982), which was applying the terms of a then-existing statute, I.C. § 19-1302. At that time, the statute required the prosecuting attorney to endorse on any information charging a felony the names of all witnesses known to the prosecutor at the time of the filing of the…”
State v. Ziegler, 695 P.2d 1272 (Idaho Ct. App. 1985). “Ziegler raises five issues on appeal: (1) whether the district court impermissibly allowed into evidence hearsay statements which were prejudicial to Ziegler's case; (2) whether one State witness should not have been allowed to testify since he was not disclosed to Ziegler's…”
State v. Smoot, 590 P.2d 1001 (Idaho 1978). “Smoot contends the failure of the prosecution to supply him prior to trial with the names of Robert Lamb and Susan Wood, both of whom testified for the prosecution at trial, denied him due process of law. I.C.R. 16(a)(l)(vi) provides for the discovery by the defendant of the…”
State v. Rolfe, 444 P.2d 428 (Idaho 1968). “Maguire referred to one conversation wherein appellant wanted to know if there wasn't something that could be done to have the pending charges against him dismissed and "wanted to make a deal.”
State v. Fedder, 285 P.2d 802 (Idaho 1955). “The name of the witness, Joe Williams, was not actually endorsed upon the information after the court granted leave for such endorsement. Appellant suffered no prejudice because such witness was permitted to testify without the ministerial act of endorsement on the information…”
State v. Daniel Montgomery (Idaho Ct. App. 2017). “He further argues the failure to disclose the rebuttal witnesses should have resulted in the exclusion of their testimony.”
State v. Fisk, 448 P.2d 768 (Idaho 1968). “I.C. § 19-1302 provides that on informations filed by the prosecuting attorney as informant, he shall subscribe his name thereon and endorse thereon the names of the witnesses known to him at the time of filing the information, and *681 before trial the names of such other…”
State v. Goodrick, 519 P.2d 958 (Idaho 1974). “On appeal, the defendant assigns this as error and contends that at the time the information was filed, on November 29, 1971, I.C. § 19-1302 required that the names of all witnesses .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.