Idaho Code
Idaho Code § 19-801 (2026)
Accused to be informed of charge — Right to counsel.
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
IClegislature.idaho.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Accused to be informed of charge — Right to counsel.
When the defendant is brought before the magistrate upon an arrest, either with or without warrant, on a charge of having committed a public offense, the magistrate must immediately inform him of the charge against him, and of his right to the aid of counsel in every stage of the proceedings.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9
cases, 1959–1992 · leading case: State v. Lavy, 828 P.2d 871 (Idaho 1992).
State v. Lavy, 828 P.2d 871 (Idaho 1992). “I.C. §§ 19-801, -804; I.C.R. 5 and 5.1. At that proceeding the magistrate explained Lavy's rights to him.”
State v. Mitchell, 660 P.2d 1336 (Idaho 1983). “" I.C. § 19-801 requires an arrested person taken before a magistrate to be "immediately informed .”
State v. Edmonson, 743 P.2d 459 (Idaho 1987). “The annotation to this section refers to the proceedings under I.C. § 19-801 et seq., and requires first that "the magistrate must immediately inform him of the charge *482 against him, and of his right to the aid of counsel in every stage of the proceedings," following which…”
Struve v. Wilcox, 579 P.2d 1188 (Idaho 1978). “The fact that the Idaho peace officer making the complaints alleges that a person has committed a public offense in another jurisdiction, and is a fugitive therefrom, does not make it any less a complaint of "a public offense" within the meaning of I.C. § 19-801, which provides…”
Johnson v. State, 376 P.2d 704 (Idaho 1962). “I.C. § 19-801. State v. Calkins, 63 Idaho 314 , 120 P.”
Freeman v. State, 392 P.2d 542 (Idaho 1964). “8, which provides, among other things, that when a defendant is brought before a magistrate, he must be informed of his right to the aid of counsel in every stage of the proceedings (I.”
Foster v. Walus, 347 P.2d 120 (Idaho 1959). “This Court, as in the matter of preliminary examinations, has recognized that one accused of an indictable misdemeanor or a felony is not entitled to have an attorney appointed at public expense as a matter of right to represent him at a preliminary examination under, the…”
Jean L. Chester v. The People of the State of California, 355 F.2d 778 (9th Cir. 1966). “; California Penal Code § 858; Idaho Code § 19-801 ; Revised Code Montana § 94-6101; Nevada Revised Stats.”
State v. Lavy, 828 P.2d 895 (Idaho Ct. App. 1991). “I.C. §§ 19-801, -804; I.C.R. 5 and 5.1. At that proceeding the magistrate explained Lavy’s rights to him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.