Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 2-207 (2026)

Master and county jury lists — Manner of updating. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Master and county jury lists — Manner of updating. 

(1) Updated information from the lists used to compile the master and county jury lists, including any changes, deletions and additions, shall be made to the master and county jury lists from time to time as determined by the jury commission or the supreme court, but at a minimum not less frequently than December of each odd-numbered year.

(2)  In the alternative, or in addition to the procedure set forth in subsection (1) of this section, in December of each odd-numbered year, or more frequently as determined by the jury commission or the supreme court, the master and county jury lists shall be emptied and refilled as prescribed in section 2-206, Idaho Code.
(3)  Pursuant to the provisions of subsections (1) and (2) of this section, the supreme court shall determine the method and timing of updating the master jury list, and the jury commission shall determine the method and timing of updating any county jury list that is separately compiled and maintained by a county.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1977–1990 · leading case: S. Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc., 567 P.2d 1246 (Idaho 1977).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
S. Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc., 567 P.2d 1246 (Idaho 1977). · cites it 4× “The First Circuit Court held that a responding document "which states a condition materially altering the obligation solely to the disadvantage of the offeror" was "expressly conditional" within the meaning of § 2-207(1). [3] The seller's supposed acceptance was therefore a…”
Yount v. Boundary Cnty., 796 P.2d 516 (Idaho 1990). · cites it 4× “Idaho Code § 2-207 provides: "The jury commission for each county shall maintain a master jury wheel, into which the commission shall place the names or identifying numbers of prospective jurors taken from the master list.”
— Idaho Code § 2-207(1) — 1 case
S. Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc., 567 P.2d 1246 (Idaho 1977). “The First Circuit Court held that a responding document "which states a condition materially altering the obligation solely to the disadvantage of the offeror" was "expressly conditional" within the meaning of § 2-207(1). [3] The seller's supposed acceptance was therefore a…”
— Idaho Code § 2-207(l) — 1 case
S. Idaho Pipe & Steel Co. v. Cal-Cut Pipe & Supply, Inc., 567 P.2d 1246 (Idaho 1977). “The First Circuit Court held that a responding document "which states a condition materially altering the obligation solely to the disadvantage of the offeror" was "expressly conditional" within the meaning of § 2-207(1). [3] The seller's supposed acceptance was therefore a…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.