Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 20-519 (2026)

Evidentiary hearing. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Evidentiary hearing. 

If the juvenile denies the allegations in the petition, the court shall conduct a full evidentiary hearing, in the manner prescribed by the Idaho juvenile rules. The juvenile shall have the right to call witnesses on his own behalf. A record shall be made in all proceedings connected with the case and shall be preserved in the event of appeal. If at the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing the court finds the juvenile to come within the purview of the act, the court shall so rule, and then shall set the matter down for sentencing, or may, in the interest of time, hold a sentencing hearing at the conclusion of the evidentiary hearing if all information necessary to the disposition of the case is available at the time.

When a juvenile, other than the juvenile against whom the petition has been filed, is summoned as a witness in any hearing under this act, notwithstanding any other statutory provision, parents, a counselor, a friend or other person having a supportive relationship with the juvenile shall, if available, be permitted to remain in the courtroom at the witness stand with the juvenile during the juvenile’s testimony unless, in written findings made and entered, the court finds that the juvenile’s constitutional right to a fair trial will be unduly prejudiced.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2023 · leading case: State v. Doe (13-14), 333 P.3d 858 (Idaho Ct. App. 2014).
State v. Doe (13-14), 333 P.3d 858 (Idaho Ct. App. 2014). · cites it 8× “I.C. § 20-519. 10 omitted). Further, the Court of Appeals of Oregon had previously recognized that shackles “‘impinge on the presumption of innocence and the dignity of the judicial proceedings and may inhibit consultation with his attorney and his decision whether to take the…”
State v. Doe, 34 P.3d 1110 (Idaho Ct. App. 2001). “§ 19-4901 with § 20-519. Therefore, Doe argued that a direct appeal was the only means available for him to bring an ineffective assistance of counsel claim.”
State ex rel. A.J., 27 So. 3d 247 (La. 2009). “§ 571-41(a); Idaho Code § 20-519 , Juv. R., Rule 10; Ind.”
State v. John Doe, 469 P.3d 36 (Idaho Ct. App. 2020). · cites it 4× “15 Idaho Code § 20-519 and I.J.R. 15 describe how evidentiary hearings under the JCA should be held.”
State v. John Doe (Idaho 2023). · cites it 4× “I.C. § 20-519 (emphasis added). See also State v.”
In Re State Ex Rel. AJ, 27 So. 3d 247 (La. 2009). “§ 571-41(a); Idaho Code § 20-519 , Juv. R., Rule 10; Ind.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.