Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 20-528 (2026)

Appeals. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Appeals. 

All orders or final judgments made by any court in matters affecting a juvenile offender within the purview of this act may be appealed by the juvenile offender or the state. A decision by the court pursuant to section 20-508, Idaho Code, not to waive jurisdiction under this act over the juvenile offender may be appealed by the state. Appeals shall be reviewed as provided by the appellate rules of the supreme court of Idaho, except no undertaking shall be required. Upon filing of the notice of appeal, the district court shall take jurisdiction of the case and if the juvenile offender is in detention shall promptly hold a hearing after the filing of a request to determine whether the juvenile offender shall remain in detention.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: State v. John Doe (2012-09), 288 P.3d 805 (Idaho 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. John Doe (2012-09), 288 P.3d 805 (Idaho 2012). · cites it 6× “Idaho Code § 20-528 provides that juvenile judgments are appealable under this Court’s appellate rules, which require all appeals to be made within forty-two days from the date of the entry of judgment.”
State v. Doe, 948 P.2d 166 (Idaho Ct. App. 1997). · cites it 2× “§ 16-1819 are now codified as I.C. § 20-528. 2 . Current Idaho Juvenile Rule 21, adopted in 1996, makes certain portions of the Idaho Criminal Rules applicable to juvenile actions.”
State v. John Doe (Idaho 2023). · cites it 48× “” I.C. § 20-528. The district court concluded, consistent with the magistrate court’s ruling, that the plain language of “ ‘juvenile offender’ indicates a finding of guilt is required” for a juvenile to be “within the purview” of the JCA.”
State v. John Doe, a Juv., 563 P.3d 1238 (Idaho Ct. App. 2025). · cites it 24× “54(a)(1)(C) conflicts with Idaho Code § 20-528 because it conflicts with I.”
State v. John Doe (Idaho Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 6× “An appellant’s brief must articulate 2 Doe filed supplemental authority, citing to Idaho Code § 20-528 . Doe argues I.C. § 20-528 provides authority refuting the State’s claim that he has not preserved a claim that the district court erred by permitting W.”
State of Idaho v. John Doe, In the Interest of John Doe, A Minor Child (Idaho Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 4× “12, we do not need to consider whether it qualifies as an appeal of right under I.C. § 20-528. B. The City of Wendell’s Curfew Ordinance is Unconstitutional 4 Doe asserts that the curfew ordinance violates the Idaho and United States constitutions three different ways.”
State v. Jane Doe (2021-38) (Idaho 2023). · cites it 2× “24; I.C. § 20-528; I.J.R. 21 (incorporating, in part, the rules for appeals from magistrate to district court under I.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.