Confinement — Order of the court.
Any district judge or magistrate may order a person confined or detained, upon any grounds provided by law, in any county or municipal jail or other confinement facility within the judicial district in which the court is located. Such order may thereafter be amended to transfer such person from such jail or facility to another at any place within the judicial district. If the county in which the court is located has made an agreement with another governmental unit or agency located outside the judicial district for the confinement or detention of persons, then any district judge or magistrate acting in that county may also order a person confined or detained outside of the judicial district in the confinement facility or jail described in such agreement. All persons, officers and officials in charge of a jail or confinement facility shall accept a person for detention or confinement upon receiving a certified copy of an order made pursuant to this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cnty. of Bannock v. City of Pocatello, 715 P.2d 962 (Idaho 1986).
· cites it 40× “designate the jail of a contiguous county for the confinement of the prisoners of his county... ." (Emphasis added.”
Brennan v. State, 841 P.2d 441 (Idaho Ct. App. 1992).
· cites it 10× “Brennan continued to assert that after his conviction and sentences were vacated by this Court his confinement under the custody of the Board of Correction was illegal, and that under I.C. § 20-604 he should have been transferred back to the county jail within the jurisdiction…”
Saint Alphonsus Reg'l Med. Ctr. v. Raney, 413 P.3d 742 (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 5× “Saint Alphonsus filed a verified complaint for declaratory judgment and damages against Ada County, claiming that, pursuant to Idaho Code sections 20-604 and 20-605, Ada County improperly denied Saint Alphonsus' claim for payment for the entire hospitalization.”
State v. Horejs, 141 P.3d 1129 (Idaho Ct. App. 2006).
· cites it 2× “The county jails are required under I.C. § 20-604 to accept a person for confinement upon receiving a judgment or other judicial order for confinement.”
State v. Rocque, 660 P.2d 57 (Idaho 1983).
· cites it 4× “" I.C. § 20-604 states, inter alia, that "[a]ll persons, officers and officials in charge of a jail or confinement facility shall accept a person for detention or confinement upon receiving a certified copy of an order made pursuant to this section.”
Sterling v. Bloom, 723 P.2d 755 (Idaho 1986).
· cites it 4× “Similar to the present case, the sheriff in the Jacobson case, was accused of acting in direct contravention of the order and the statutory duty imposed by then I.C. § 20-604, [11] *806 by removing the committed individual from the county jail prior to trial and releasing him to…”
State v. Jones, 36 P.2d 530 (Idaho 1934).
· cites it 4× “, section 20-604, when considered and construed in pari materia with I.”
St. Al's RMC v. Ada Co Sheriff & Bd of Comm (Idaho 2018).
· cites it 5× “Saint Alphonsus filed a verified complaint for declaratory judgment and damages against Ada County, claiming that, pursuant to Idaho Code sections 20-604 and 20-605, Ada County improperly denied Saint Alphonsus’ claim for payment for the entire hospitalization.”
State v. Benjamin Patrick Dugan, 335 P.3d 594 (Idaho Ct. App. 2014).
· cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 20-242 applies to a prisoner in the custody of the state board of correction who is permitted to continue employment or education and who fails to return to the jail, facility, or residence that he was required to return to.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.