Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 22-1210 (2026)

Limit on state liability — Compensation and expenses.

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Limit on state liability — Compensation and expenses.

All contractual expenses incurred by the commission in performing its duties and exercising its powers shall be without liability on the part of the state. All tort obligations arising out of acts and omissions of the commission are binding on the state of Idaho as, and to the extent provided for, in chapter 9, title 6, Idaho Code.

No member of the commission shall receive any compensation for his services as such member, except as provided in section 22-1202, Idaho Code, but members and employees of the commission and other persons acting under the direction of the commission shall, if approved by the commission, be reimbursed for their actual and reasonable expenses incurred in performing their duties under this chapter.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases, 1976–2000 · leading case: Idaho Potato Comm'n v. Washington Potato Comm'n, 410 F. Supp. 171 (D. Idaho 1976).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Idaho Potato Comm'n v. Washington Potato Comm'n, 410 F. Supp. 171 (D. Idaho 1976). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 22-1210 . Idaho Code § 22-1201 declares the policy of the Act as that of promoting Idaho’s potato industry by expanding markets, thereby promoting the general welfare of the people.”

Idaho Potato Comm'n v. M & M Produce Farms & Sales, 35 F. Supp. 2d 313 (S.D.N.Y. 1999). “” Idaho Code § 22-1210 . The relevant statutory provision in Mancuso was almost identical.”

Idaho Potato Comm'n v. M & M Produce Farms & Sales, 95 F. Supp. 2d 150 (S.D.N.Y. 2000). “The first legislative change in Idaho Code § 22-1210 read as follows: All contractual expenses incurred by the-[IPC] in performing its duties and exercising its powers shall be without liability on the part of the state.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.