Idaho Code
Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 29-113 (2026)

Release for personal injury. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Release for personal injury. 

Any agreement entered into by any person within fifteen (15) days after he incurs a personal injury, which may adversely affect his right to be compensated for such injury, may be disavowed by such injured person within one (1) year after the making of the agreement. No agreement disavowed may be introduced as evidence in any subsequent court or administrative proceeding.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 7 cases, 1963–2004 · leading case: Williams v. Glash, 789 S.W.2d 261 (Tex. 1990).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Williams v. Glash, 789 S.W.2d 261 (Tex. 1990). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 29-113 (1961). For other similar statutes, see also Md.”
Ranta v. Rake, 421 P.2d 747 (Idaho 1966). · cites it 4× “See also I.C. § 29-113 [1] , which we find is indicative of recognition by the Idaho legislature, that releases of claims for personal injuries involve special policy considerations.”
Casey v. Proctor, 378 P.2d 579 (Cal. 1963). · cites it 2× “" (See also Idaho Code, § 29-113; Conn. Gen. Stat. (1958) § 52-572a; Maine Rev.”
Wise v. Prescott, 151 So. 2d 356 (La. 1963). “1076, provides a throe-year limitation for disavowal; Idaho’s, 5 Idaho Code § 29-113 , provides a one-year period for disavowal.”
Larson v. Emmett Jt. Sch. Dist. No. 221, 577 P.2d 1168 (Idaho 1978). · cites it 2× “Indicative of the legislative frame of mind as to whether an accident victim should reasonably be “doing business” with regard to his legal rights and claims arising out of a personal injury suffered in the accident, we have the benefit of I.C. § 29-113, which provides: 29-113.…”
Traylor v. Wachter, 598 P.2d 1061 (Kan. Ct. App. 1979). “12, § 1076 [disavow within three years]; Idaho Code § 29-113 [disavow within one year].”
Crockett v. Waller-Smith, 63 Va. Cir. 562 (Roanoke County Cir. Ct. 2004). “This question is one of first impression within Virginia and, while other states have similar statutes, none requires a rescission clause and, thus, are not helpful in answering this question.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.