Survey of land to be excluded.
The board of directors may cause any survey to be made it deems necessary for the purpose of determining the change in the district by reason of an exclusion or proposed exclusion. In any case where the land is excluded on the ground that it is too high to receive any benefit from the irrigation works of said district without pumping by the landowner, the cost of all surveys shall be borne by the irrigation district. The board may not, however, require a survey when the land sought to be excluded lies entirely within a subdivision as defined in section 50-1301, Idaho Code. If the land described in the petition is described in accordance with the public survey or in accordance with a plat approved, filed and recorded as provided by law, the cost of survey shall be borne by the district.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in
3
cases, 1946–1962 · leading case:
Sanders v. Ray, 174 P.2d 836 (Idaho 1946).
Sanders v. Ray, 174 P.2d 836 (Idaho 1946).
“The ruling of the Industrial Accident Board that the “stepchildren” of the deceased are dependents, under the facts herein disclosed, is a first impression case in this jurisdiction, and the reason for such holding and award is predicated upon portions of sections 43-1105 and…”
Edwards v. Holmes Constr. Co., 372 P.2d 406 (Idaho 1962).
“§ 43-1105, now I.C. § 72-305, has been amended to provide that the term “child” does not include a step-child unless actually dependent.”
In Re Jones, 372 P.2d 406 (Idaho 1962).
“§ 43-1105, now I.C. § 72-305, has been amended to provide that the term "child" does not include a step-child unless actually dependent.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.