Idaho Code

Idaho Code § 49-512 (2026)

Security interests — Method of giving constructive notice exclusive. 

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section IClegislature.idaho.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Security interests — Method of giving constructive notice exclusive. 

The method provided in this chapter for perfection of a security interest on a vehicle is exclusive, except as to security interests in vehicles held in inventory for sale, which shall be governed by the provisions of chapter 9, title 28, Idaho Code.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6 cases, 1954–2006 · leading case: In Re Seibold, 351 B.R. 741 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2006).
In Re Seibold, 351 B.R. 741 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2006). · cites it 2× “Under Article Nine, a security interest attaches to collateral and becomes enforceable against the debtor when “(1) value has been given; (2) the debtor has rights in the collateral or the power to transfer rights in the collateral to a secured party; and .”
Hergert v. Bank of the West (In Re Hergert), 275 B.R. 58 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2002). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 49-512 states that: The method provided in the chapter for perfection of a security interest on a vehicle is exclusive, except as to the security interests in vehicles held in inventory for sale, which shall be governed by the provisions of chapter 9, title 28,…”
Fitzgerald v. First Sec. Bank of Idaho, N.A. (In Re Walker), 161 B.R. 484 (Bankr. D. Idaho 1993). · cites it 2× “Idaho Code § 28-9-302 (3)(b), (4); Idaho Code § 49-512 ; Simplot v. Owens, 119 Idaho 243 , 805 P.”
Owen v. Lundstrom (In re Owen), 349 B.R. 66 (Bankr. D. Idaho 2006). · cites it 2× “Under Idaho Code § 28-9-203 , a security interest attaches to collateral and becomes enforceable against the debtor and third parties when “(1) value has been given; (2) the debtor has rights in the collateral or the power to transfer rights in the collateral to a secured party;…”
Monson v. Boyd, 348 P.2d 93 (Idaho 1959). · cites it 2× “” I.C. § 49-512. In Lees v. Colgan, 120 Cal.”
Matheson v. Idaho Hardware & Plumbing Co., 270 P.2d 841 (Idaho 1954). · cites it 2× “He must also be presumed to have known that the law requires an overtaking vehicle in passing another going in the same direction, to pass to the left, § 49-512, I.C., and that the plaintiff in compliance with the law might undertake to turn to the left in order to pass.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.