Actions barred in another state.
When a cause of action has arisen in another state or territory, or in a foreign country, and by the laws thereof an action thereon can not there be maintained against a person by reason of the lapse of time, an action thereon shall not be maintained against him in this state, except in favor of one who has been a citizen of this state and who has held the cause of action from the time it accrued.
Notes of Decisions
Miller v. Stauffer Chem. Co., 581 P.2d 345 (Idaho 1978).
· cites it 26× “Idaho Code § 5-239 represents a weighing by the legislature of the potential interests of these jurisdictions and a judgment that, in order to promote uniformity of result and discourage forum shopping, an action in an Idaho court should be governed by the statute of limitations…”
Strong v. Unumprovident Corp., 393 F. Supp. 2d 1012 (D. Idaho 2005).
· cites it 4× “Idaho’s borrowing statute, Idaho Code § 5-239 , provides that when a cause of action has arisen in another state and is barred by that state’s statute of limitation, that state's statute of limitations shall control, "except in favor of one who has been a citizen of this state…”
Merchants & Planters Nat'l Bank of Sherman v. Appleyard, 77 S.E.2d 783 (N.C. 1953).
“58 (Idaho now has a provision in its statute which prevents recovery on a claim in that State, if barred in the jurisdiction where the cause of action arose, Idaho Code 5-239; Ross v. Rees, 55 Iowa 296 , 7 N.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.